LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

OpenAI GPT-6 Astra

  • OpenAI
  • Released September 4, 2026
  • No public weights listed
  • 1.05M context

As of October 20, 2026, OpenAI GPT-6 Astra ranks #4 of 213 models overall with 52.7 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks #1 of 116. OpenAI GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens. It was released on September 4, 2026.

Its output price ranks 337 of 349 priced models, counting from the cheapest.

  • Coding index 88.7 Partial, 2 benchmarks
  • Cost per solved task Not computable No published attempt cost
  • Output, per million tokens $50.00 337 of 349 from the cheapest
  • Input, per million tokens $10.00 OpenRouter list price
  • Context window 1.05M Tokens per request

About and specs

GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's flagship model for demanding end-to-end work. It is suited for advanced analysis, software engineering, deep research, scientific work, and document creation, with particular strengths in long-horizon...

API model id openai/gpt-6-astra
  • Tool callingListed
  • Structured outputsListed
  • JSON modeListed
  • Reasoning modeListed
  • Web searchNot listed
Takes in
Files, Images, Text
Gives back
Text
Context window
1.05M tokens
Max output
128K tokens
Knowledge cutoff
April 30, 2026, per OpenAI model documentation
Cached input $/Mtok
$1.00
Cache write $/Mtok
$12.50
Reasoning $/Mtok
Not priced apart
Web search, per request
$0.01
Tokenizer
GPT
Requests moderated
Yes, by the provider
Withdrawn on
No date announced
Parameters
Not published
Downloads, all time
No public weights
Training compute
9.4e26 FLOP, Epoch AI estimate
Output speed
68 tokens/s, Max effort
Time to first token
239 s, Max effort
Speed on OpenRouter
32 tokens/s via OpenAI, 30-minute median
First token on OpenRouter
5.2 s via OpenAI, 30-minute median

Benchmarks: 92 of 190 measured

The tick on a coding bar is the median of every model measured on it. Outside coding, the place is this model's rank on that board. A board that never ran the model says so.

Coding index

88.7
  • Aider polyglot Not measured
  • SWE-bench Verified Not measured
  • LiveBench coding 93.7% 94 of 100
  • LMArena WebDev Elo, scaled from 1200 to 1900 1774 Elo 82 of 100

The index averages only the coding benchmarks that have a result; the others are skipped, never filled in. How it is weighted

Other public boards

All rankings

Coding21 of 34 boards

15 more coding boards

Not measured on SWE-bench Lite, SWE-bench (full test set), SWE-bench Multimodal, SWE-bench Multilingual, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI), SkillsBench (Vals AI), LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench, Cybench, LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT

Intelligence2 of 2 boards

Agentic work26 of 39 boards

20 more agentic work boards

Not measured on Design Arena: agents building Android apps, Design Arena: agents building games, Design Arena: HTML slides, Design Arena: spreadsheets, τ²-Bench Telecom, METR time horizons, GDPval, OSWorld 2.0, DeepResearch Bench, PostTrainBench, TheAgentCompany, OSWorld, LMArena Search

Reasoning13 of 21 boards

7 more reasoning boards

Not measured on GPQA Diamond, MMMU Pro (Vals AI), SimpleBench, VPCT, BIG-Bench Hard, LMArena Text: hard prompts, LMArena Text: expert, LMArena Text: hard prompts in English

Math4 of 13 boards

Not measured on AIME, MATH 500 (Vals AI), MGSM (Vals AI), AA Math Index, AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run), MATH level 5, GSM8K, LMArena Text: math, LMArena Text: mathematical work

Knowledge2 of 17 boards

Not measured on MMLU Pro, LegalBench (Vals AI), CaseLaw (Vals AI), CorpFin (Vals AI), TaxEval (Vals AI), MortgageTax (Vals AI), MedQA (Vals AI), MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run), MMLU, GeoBench, AI2 Reasoning Challenge, LMArena Text: science, LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, LMArena Text: legal and government, LMArena Text: business and finance

Web design9 of 9 boards

3 more web design boards

General13 of 46 boards

7 more general boards

Not measured on Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI), Vals Multimodal Index, IFBench, Fiction.LiveBench, Creative writing (Lech Mazur), CL-bench, Surface Evolver Bench, ExploitBench, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, PIQA, CL-bench Life, LMArena Text, LMArena Text: instruction following, LMArena Text: creative writing, LMArena Text: English, LMArena Text: non-English, LMArena Text: Chinese, LMArena Text: German, LMArena Text: Japanese, LMArena Text: Korean, LMArena Text: French, LMArena Text: Spanish, LMArena Text: Russian, LMArena Text: Polish, LMArena Text: multi-turn, LMArena Text: longer queries, LMArena Text: writing and language, LMArena Text: entertainment and media, LMArena Vision: humor, LMArena Vision: captioning, LMArena Vision: recognizing things, LMArena Document

Image generation0 of 5 boards

Not measured on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design, Design Arena: logos, LMArena Text to Image, LMArena Image Edit

Public boards shown as published (Vals AI, Artificial Analysis, Design Arena) and kept out of the coding index. Each links to its source on the benchmark page.

All 190 benchmarks as a table
Benchmark results for OpenAI GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkResultIndex weight
Aider polyglotCoding Not measured 35%
SWE-bench VerifiedCoding Not measured 30%
SWE-bench LiteCoding Not measured Not in index
SWE-bench (full test set)Coding Not measured Not in index
SWE-bench MultimodalCoding Not measured Not in index
SWE-bench MultilingualCoding Not measured Not in index
LiveBench codingCoding 93.7% 20%
LMArena WebDevCoding 1774 15%
Vals IndexGeneral 65.0% Not in index
GPQA DiamondReasoning Not measured Not in index
AIMEMath Not measured Not in index
MMLU ProKnowledge Not measured Not in index
AA Intelligence IndexIntelligence 52.7 Not in index
AA Coding IndexCoding 76.9 Not in index
AA Agentic IndexAgentic work 51.0 Not in index
Design Arena: websitesWeb design 1338 Not in index
Design Arena: UI componentsWeb design 1400 Not in index
Design Arena: game devWeb design 1474 Not in index
Design Arena: data vizWeb design 1333 Not in index
Design Arena: 3DWeb design 1505 Not in index
Design Arena: all code categoriesWeb design 1379 Not in index
Design Arena: SVGWeb design 1431 Not in index
Design Arena: ASCII artWeb design 1356 Not in index
Design Arena: agents building web appsAgentic work 1373 Not in index
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsAgentic work 1357 Not in index
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsAgentic work 1308 Not in index
Design Arena: agents building Android appsAgentic work Not measured Not in index
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesAgentic work 1348 Not in index
Design Arena: agents building gamesAgentic work Not measured Not in index
Design Arena: HTML slidesAgentic work Not measured Not in index
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesAgentic work 1245 Not in index
Design Arena: spreadsheetsAgentic work Not measured Not in index
Design Arena: imagesImage generation Not measured Not in index
Design Arena: graphic designImage generation Not measured Not in index
Design Arena: logosImage generation Not measured Not in index
LiveBench reasoningReasoning 92.7% Not in index
LiveBench data analysisGeneral 83.0% Not in index
LiveBench researchAgentic work 85.2% Not in index
LiveBench browserAgentic work 84.0% Not in index
LiveBench long agenticAgentic work 82.4% Not in index
LiveBench designWeb design 82.0% Not in index
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Coding Not measured Not in index
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Coding Not measured Not in index
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Coding 59.6% Not in index
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Coding 89.6% Not in index
Code migration (Vals AI)Coding 67.7% Not in index
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Coding 5.5% Not in index
SREBench (Vals AI)Agentic work 56.9% Not in index
IOI (Vals AI)Coding 100.0% Not in index
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Coding 87.3% Not in index
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Coding 43.3% Not in index
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Coding 27.6% Not in index
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Coding Not measured Not in index
CyberBench (Vals AI)Coding 41.1% Not in index
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Agentic work 53.5% Not in index
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Agentic work 20.7% Not in index
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Agentic work 39.4% Not in index
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Agentic work 7.1% Not in index
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Agentic work 71.7% Not in index
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Agentic work 79.3% Not in index
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Agentic work 62.9% Not in index
Vals Science IndexAgentic work 65.1% Not in index
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Agentic work 90.5% Not in index
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Agentic work 19.2% Not in index
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Agentic work 23.3% Not in index
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)General Not measured Not in index
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Reasoning 53.1% Not in index
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Reasoning Not measured Not in index
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Math Not measured Not in index
MGSM (Vals AI)Math Not measured Not in index
SAGE (Vals AI)General 46.4% Not in index
LegalBench (Vals AI)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
CorpFin (Vals AI)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
TaxEval (Vals AI)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
MedQA (Vals AI)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
MedCode (Vals AI)Knowledge 48.5% Not in index
MedScribe (Vals AI)General 87.9% Not in index
Vals Multimodal IndexGeneral Not measured Not in index
AA Math IndexMath Not measured Not in index
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Reasoning 96.3% Not in index
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Reasoning 54.7% Not in index
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Knowledge Not measured Not in index
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Coding Not measured Not in index
SciCodeCoding 56.5% Not in index
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Coding Not measured Not in index
IFBenchGeneral Not measured Not in index
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)General 80.7% Not in index
τ²-Bench TelecomAgentic work Not measured Not in index
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Math Not measured Not in index
Terminal-BenchCoding Not measured Not in index
DeepSWECoding 74.1% Not in index
FrontierCodeCoding 53.3% Not in index
FrontierSWECoding 65.5% Not in index
GSO-BenchCoding 79.4% Not in index
WeirdMLCoding 93.3% Not in index
MirrorCodeCoding 46.7% Not in index
APEX-AgentsAgentic work 64.7% Not in index
METR time horizonsAgentic work Not measured Not in index
Remote Labor IndexAgentic work 20.8% Not in index
GDPvalAgentic work Not measured Not in index
OSWorld 2.0Agentic work Not measured Not in index
BALROGAgentic work 68.3% Not in index
DeepResearch BenchAgentic work Not measured Not in index
PostTrainBenchAgentic work Not measured Not in index
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Reasoning 95.8% Not in index
ARC-AGIReasoning 98.5% Not in index
ARC-AGI-2Reasoning 95.0% Not in index
Humanity's Last ExamReasoning 54.8% Not in index
SimpleBenchReasoning Not measured Not in index
Chess puzzlesReasoning 74.0% Not in index
Mystery game puzzlesReasoning 84.0% Not in index
EBR-benchReasoning 76.2% Not in index
OTIS Mock AIMEMath 100.0% Not in index
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Math 93.7% Not in index
FrontierMath, tier 4Math 97.6% Not in index
ProofBenchMath 99.0% Not in index
MATH level 5Math Not measured Not in index
GSM8KMath Not measured Not in index
SimpleQA VerifiedKnowledge 75.6% Not in index
MMLUKnowledge Not measured Not in index
GeoBenchKnowledge Not measured Not in index
DTBenchGeneral 97.3% Not in index
LMCAGeneral 64.4% Not in index
Fiction.LiveBenchGeneral Not measured Not in index
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)General Not measured Not in index
CL-benchGeneral Not measured Not in index
Surface Evolver BenchGeneral Not measured Not in index
Furniture assemblyGeneral 80.0% Not in index
ExploitBenchGeneral Not measured Not in index
CybenchCoding Not measured Not in index
TheAgentCompanyAgentic work Not measured Not in index
OSWorldAgentic work Not measured Not in index
SpireClimbAgentic work 25.7% Not in index
VPCTReasoning Not measured Not in index
BIG-Bench HardReasoning Not measured Not in index
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeKnowledge Not measured Not in index
HellaSwagGeneral Not measured Not in index
WinoGrandeGeneral Not measured Not in index
PIQAGeneral Not measured Not in index
CL-bench LifeGeneral Not measured Not in index
ALE-BenchCoding 2951.3 Not in index
Vending-Bench 2Agentic work $15,515 Not in index
Epoch Capabilities IndexIntelligence 166.4 Not in index
LMArena TextGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: codingCoding Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: hard promptsReasoning Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: mathMath Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: instruction followingGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: creative writingGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena VisionGeneral 1280 Not in index
LMArena Text: EnglishGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: non-EnglishGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: ChineseGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: GermanGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: JapaneseGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: KoreanGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: FrenchGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: SpanishGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: RussianGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: PolishGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: multi-turnGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: longer queriesGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: expertReasoning Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishReasoning Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: software and ITCoding Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: mathematical workMath Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: scienceKnowledge Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareKnowledge Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: legal and governmentKnowledge Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: business and financeKnowledge Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: writing and languageGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena WebDev: ReactCoding 1798 Not in index
LMArena WebDev: HTMLCoding 1775 Not in index
LMArena WebDev: from an imageCoding 1726 Not in index
LMArena Vision: EnglishGeneral 1280 Not in index
LMArena Vision: ChineseGeneral 1361 Not in index
LMArena Vision: reading textGeneral 1292 Not in index
LMArena Vision: diagramsReasoning 1297 Not in index
LMArena Vision: homeworkReasoning 1337 Not in index
LMArena Vision: humorGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Vision: captioningGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Vision: creative writingGeneral 1286 Not in index
LMArena SearchAgentic work Not measured Not in index
LMArena DocumentGeneral Not measured Not in index
LMArena Text to ImageImage generation Not measured Not in index
LMArena Image EditImage generation Not measured Not in index

What it costs

A list price says what a token costs. The cost per solved task says what a working answer costs, which is the number that decides.

Output price against the market

GPT-6 Astra pricing
$0.0112Dashed line: median $1.80, log scale$600.00
$50.00 per million output tokens is cheaper than 3% of the 344 paid models in the catalog.

Cost per solved task

How it is computed

Neither board that publishes what a SWE-bench Verified attempt costs, Vals AI and swebench.com, has run this model. We leave the number out rather than estimate it.

LiveBench, on its own coding tasks, publishes what one task cost this model: $3.315, at a score of 93.7%. LiveBench counts that as $3.538 per successful task. Different tasks from SWE-bench, so it is not our number and does not enter its ranking. LiveBench coding

Nearly as good as GPT-6 Astra, for less

What the boards say about its runs

Beside a result, many boards publish what the run cost, how long it took, the tokens it spent or the votes behind a rating. Each figure as its board printed it, one board per row.

What each board publishes about the runs behind OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra's results
BoardResultWhat the run costAlso published
LiveBench coding 93.7% $3.3154 per task Output tokens per task 13,904
Vals Index 65.0% $21.28 per test Duration, as printed 33m 39s
LiveBench reasoning 92.7% $0.3898 per task Output tokens per task 7,577
LiveBench data analysis 83.0% $0.6989 per task Output tokens per task 13,240
LiveBench research 85.2% $17.6599 per task Output tokens per task 33,608
LiveBench browser 84.0% $5.9097 per task Output tokens per task 3,639
LiveBench long agentic 82.4% $38.3789 per task Output tokens per task 210,429
LiveBench design 82.0% $2.8756 per task Output tokens per task 24,627
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) 59.6% $9.58 per test Duration, as printed 35m 42s
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) 89.6% $38.51 per test Duration, as printed 39m 04s
Code migration (Vals AI) 67.7% $44.36 per test Duration, as printed 58m 30s
ProgramBench (Vals AI) 5.5% $11.57 per test Duration, as printed 27m 02s
48 more boards
What each board publishes about the runs behind OpenAI: GPT-6 Astra's results, continued
SREBench (Vals AI) 56.9% $10.24 per test Duration, as printed 17m 51s
IOI (Vals AI) 100.0% $6.50 per test Duration, as printed 31m 40s
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) 87.3% $1.34 per test Duration, as printed 4m 34s
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) 43.3% $1.81 per test Duration, as printed 7m 03s
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) 27.6% $84.72 per test Duration, as printed 3h 26m
CyberBench (Vals AI) 41.1% $1.84 per test Duration, as printed 4m 10s
Finance Agent (Vals AI) 53.5% $6.82 per test Duration, as printed 11m 33s
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) 20.7% $5.80 per test Duration, as printed 15m 01s
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) 39.4% $10.58 per test Duration, as printed 24m 51s
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) 7.1% $25.46 per test Duration, as printed 32m 33s
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) 71.7% $5.83 per test Duration, as printed 13m 24s
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) 79.3% $1.72 per test Duration, as printed 4m 46s
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) 62.9% $20.80 per test Duration, as printed 1h 49m
Vals Science Index 65.1% $8.03 per test Duration, as printed 40m 37s
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) 53.1% $1.56 per test Duration, as printed 8m 09s
DeepSWE 74.1% $4.4291 mean cost per task Solved in 4 tries 80.5% · Output tokens per task 29,557 · Agent steps per task 29
FrontierSWE 65.5% $1029.65 average cost per task Best of 5 runs 73.0% · Hours per task 12.1 h
WeirdML 93.3% $7.7485 per run Median lines of code 485
ProofBench 99.0% $1.7124 per test Time per proof 5m 08s
ALE-Bench 2951.3 $2.8641 per problem Tokens per problem 60,104
LMArena WebDev 1774 Elo Not published Votes 6,169 · Interval (±) ±10.2
Design Arena: websites 1338 Elo Not published Battles 2,236
Design Arena: UI components 1400 Elo Not published Battles 561
Design Arena: game dev 1474 Elo Not published Battles 631
Design Arena: data viz 1333 Elo Not published Battles 356
Design Arena: 3D 1505 Elo Not published Battles 251
Design Arena: all code categories 1379 Elo Not published Battles 8,813
Design Arena: SVG 1431 Elo Not published Battles 1,626
Design Arena: ASCII art 1356 Elo Not published Battles 167
Design Arena: agents building web apps 1373 Elo Not published Battles 650
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps 1357 Elo Not published Battles 553
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps 1308 Elo Not published Battles 588
Design Arena: agents building Godot games 1348 Elo Not published Battles 328
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides 1245 Elo Not published Battles 804
SAGE (Vals AI) 46.4% Not published Latency, as printed 42 s
MedCode (Vals AI) 48.5% Not published Latency, as printed 1m 43s
MedScribe (Vals AI) 87.9% Not published Latency, as printed 2m 34s
APEX-Agents 64.7% Not published Mean score 75.1%
LMArena Vision 1280 Elo Not published Votes 4,012 · Interval (±) ±10.3
LMArena WebDev: React 1798 Elo Not published Votes 3,665 · Interval (±) ±13.0
LMArena WebDev: HTML 1775 Elo Not published Votes 1,205 · Interval (±) ±22.1
LMArena WebDev: from an image 1726 Elo Not published Votes 3,181 · Interval (±) ±12.4
LMArena Vision: English 1280 Elo Not published Votes 1,343 · Interval (±) ±16.9
LMArena Vision: Chinese 1361 Elo Not published Votes 259 · Interval (±) ±37.0
LMArena Vision: reading text 1292 Elo Not published Votes 2,740 · Interval (±) ±11.8
LMArena Vision: diagrams 1297 Elo Not published Votes 966 · Interval (±) ±19.5
LMArena Vision: homework 1337 Elo Not published Votes 560 · Interval (±) ±24.8
LMArena Vision: creative writing 1286 Elo Not published Votes 408 · Interval (±) ±30.8

On these lists

Compare with models of a similar score

All 135 comparisons for GPT-6 Astra