LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Finance Agent (Vals AI) leaderboard

Gemini 4 Argon leads
65.4%
models measured
75
lead over #2
+4.0 pts
median
51.0%

Leader on Finance Agent (Vals AI) · read October 21

On October 21, 2026, 75 of our catalog's models had a Finance Agent (Vals AI) result, and Google Gemini 4 Argon led with 65.4%.

Research tasks a financial analyst does, worked by an agent with tools. Share answered correctly, as Vals AI grades it.

Role in the index

We collect this benchmark and show it as supporting evidence. It is not part of the Vibe Coding Index, because it measures something other than coding and the index is about coding. Read the methodology

75 models with a result

Original board: Vals AI boards
Finance Agent (Vals AI) results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Cost per test Duration, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 65.4% $4.38 16m 21s 80.5 $10.00
2 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 61.4% $2.00 3m 21s 70.5 $4.125
3 Muse Spark OpenMeta 61.3% $0.77 24m 13s 62.1 $4.25
4 Muse Spark 1.2Meta 60.6% $0.77 5m 04s 65.1 $4.25
5 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 59.0% $1.48 3m 01s 69.9 $3.75
6 Muse Spark 1.3Meta 58.9% $0.74 5m 42s 79.7 $4.25
7 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 58.9% $8.35 18m 14s 89.1 $50.00
8 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 58.6% $5.12 9m 58s 81.8 $25.00
9 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 58.6% $9.22 33m 08s 92.2 $20.00
10 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 58.1% $6.55 31m 43s 88.9 $10.00
11 Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 57.9% $2.51 5m 22s 42.8 $9.00
12 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 57.9% $0.05 14m 51s 71.0 $0.50
13 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi 57.3% $0.20 10m 48s 72.6 $0.87
14 Muse Spark 1.1Meta 57.2% $0.72 6m 55s 48.9 $4.25
15 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek 57.0% $0.46 14m 39s 83.3 $0.60
16 Muse WonderMeta 56.6% $2.67 6m 09s 64.5 $20.00
17 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 56.3% $8.06 10m 11s 82.1 $50.00
18 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle 56.3% $1.40 3m 45s 48.3 $3.75
19 MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi 56.3% $0.07 7m 02s 61.9 $0.28
20 GLM 5.3Z.ai 55.8% $1.07 15m 50s 73.1 $1.40
21 Hy4 previewTencent 55.1% $0.59 23m 45s 61.6 $2.501
22 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 55.0% $0.28 12m 52s 61.5 $1.20
23 Mistral Large 4Mistral AI 54.7% $1.20 26m 02s 55.3 $4.18
24 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 54.4% $3.63 24m 10s 69.0 $12.00
25 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 54.1% $1.64 30m 49s 75.9 $0.50
26 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 53.9% $4.22 9m 07s 66.0 $25.00
27 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 53.9% $0.75 13m 12s 63.5 $10.00
28 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 53.8% $1.25 19m 25s 76.7 $20.00
29 Grok 4.6xAI 53.7% $1.66 16m 41s 76.4 $6.00
30 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 53.5% $6.82 11m 33s 88.7 $50.00
31 DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek 53.5% $0.21 6m 04s 77.2 $0.525
32 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 53.1% $1.91 4m 46s 61.8 $11.936
33 Grok 4.7xAI 52.3% $2.72 15m 33s 75.0 $6.00
34 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 52.0% $1.62 15m 25s 88.7 $10.00
35 Ember-1Fireworks 51.8% $1.95 13m 19s Not benchmarked $15.00
36 GPT-5.5OpenAI 51.8% $4.15 11m 02s 67.8 $30.00
37 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic 51.5% $4.03 6m 00s 51.1 $25.00
38 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic 51.0% $2.41 11m 36s 57.8 $15.00
39 Step 5 PreviewStepFun 50.7% $0.62 12m 28s 71.4 $2.70
40 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 50.6% $1.24 19m 35s 63.5 $6.00
41 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 50.4% $0.88 16m 15s 54.6 $1.98
42 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI 49.9% $0.12 14m 58s 71.4 $0.50
43 GLM 5.2Z.ai 49.7% $0.71 7m 53s 57.7 $7.00
44 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek 49.5% $0.28 8m 10s Not benchmarked $1.32
45 GPT-6 SolOpenAI 49.0% $2.12 9m 00s 82.8 $10.00
46 Qwen3.8 27BQwen 48.5% $0.75 10m 22s 73.6 $1.35
47 Grok 4.5xAI 48.4% $1.16 4m 49s 75.5 $6.00
48 MiniMax M3MiniMax 48.3% $0.32 8m 17s 57.8 $1.20
49 Qwen3.7 MaxQwen 47.8% $0.55 10m 35s 45.1 $4.425
50 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle 47.4% $0.39 2m 23s 33.6 $2.50
51 T InklingThinking Machines 46.6% $1.00 18m 02s 49.7 $4.05
52 GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI 45.4% $1.20 35m 54s 28.2 $4.50
53 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI 44.9% $1.14 27m 10s 44.2 $3.41
54 GLM 5.1Z.ai 44.8% $0.62 15m 24s 44.0 $4.40
55 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek 44.1% $0.88 25m 26s 35.3 $1.9105
56 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 43.0% $1.59 3m 28s 35.3 $12.00
57 Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle 42.5% $0.57 4m 07s 75.8 $3.00
58 MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi 41.5% $0.21 8m 17s 40.0 $0.609
59 T Inkling SmallThinking Machines 41.3% $0.23 16m 34s 29.9 $1.20
60 Qwen3.6 PlusQwen 40.9% $0.81 10m 12s 37.4 $1.95
61 GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI 38.2% $0.16 5m 35s Not benchmarked $1.25
62 Qwen3.7 PlusQwen 38.2% $0.36 9m 02s Not benchmarked $1.28
63 Grok 4.3xAI 37.7% $0.85 10m 15s 22.5 $2.50
64 Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA 37.7% Not published 4m 14s Not benchmarked $2.40
65 MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi 36.7% $0.09 5m 39s 34.0 $0.238
66 Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI 35.8% $0.29 12m 32s 58.5 $2.50
67 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI 32.1% $1.91 12m 48s 9.2 $7.50
68 Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic 31.0% $0.60 2m 57s 49.8 $5.00
69 Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI 30.3% $0.05 2m 37s Not benchmarked $0.063
70 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle 30.0% $0.14 55 s 8.1 $1.50
71 Grok 4.20xAI 28.5% $0.79 5m 51s Not benchmarked $2.50
72 MiniMax M2.7MiniMax 27.9% $0.18 13m 24s 28.4 $1.20
73 Mercury 2.5Inception 18.9% $0.11 1m 32s Not benchmarked $0.15
74 Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA 18.5% $0.03 9m 00s Not benchmarked $0.20
75 Command ACohere 9.0% Not published 9m 27s Not benchmarked $10.00

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 132 rows were read from the source on October 21, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Cost per test is what Vals AI reports one test cost on the run behind the result, in US dollars. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.