LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

LLM rankings

Claude Opus 5.5 leads
57.6
models measured
213
lead over #2
+1.6
median
18.5

Leader on AA Intelligence Index · read October 20

  1. 57.6 Claude Opus 5.5
  2. 56.0 Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 53.4 Claude Fable 5.1

Coding is our flagship ranking: an index over four coding benchmarks, the evidence behind each score and what a solved task costs. The other 7 axes each rank models on one public board, shown as published, with its date.

Every ranking

Coding is our index over four coding benchmarks; every other ranking is one public board, shown as published. Each row opens its full ranking.

Every ranking, its leader and the next two
RankingLeaderScoreNextRankedBoard updated
CodingVibe Coding Index, four coding benchmarks 1 Claude Opus 5.5 92.2 2Claude Fable 5.189.13Claude Sonnet 5.588.9 136 October 20
IntelligenceAA Intelligence Index 1 Claude Opus 5.5 57.6 2Claude Sonnet 5.556.03Claude Fable 5.153.4 213 October 20
Agentic workAA Agentic Index 1 Claude Fable 5.1 57.9 2Claude Opus 556.53Qwen3.8 Max (0902)56.0 87 October 20
ReasoningGPQA Diamond 1 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.5% 2GPT-5.6 Sol95.2%3Grok 4.694.7% 91 September 1
MathAIME 1 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 98.1% 2GPT-5.296.9%3GPT-5.496.7% 54 April 16
KnowledgeMMLU Pro 1 Claude Fable 5.1 92.4% 2Claude Opus 591.6%3Claude Fable 591.5% 92 September 1
Web designDesign Arena: websites 1 Muse Wonder 1360 2Muse Spark 1.313563GPT-6 Astra1338 131 October 20
GeneralVals Index 1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 70.8% 2Claude Opus 5.570.2%3Gemini 4 Argon69.2% 20 October 19

The makers' medal table

In every category the makers are placed by their best model: gold, silver, bronze. Equal scores share a place, and a maker with no model on a board says so.

Makers placed by their best model in each category, with gold, silver and bronze counts
Maker 1Gold2Silver3Bronze OverallCodingAgenticReasoningMathKnowledgeWeb design
Anthropic 502 157.6 Claude Opus 5.5 192.2 Claude Opus 5.5 157.9 Claude Fable 5.1 395.6% Claude Sonnet 5.5 1100.0% Claude Sonnet 5.5 192.4% Claude Fable 5.1 31336 Claude Opus 5.5
Google 211 352.6 Gemini 4 Argon 583.1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 940.2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 196.4% Gemini 4 Argon 1100.0% Gemini 4 Argon 291.0% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 51315 Gemini 4 Argon
OpenAI 140 252.7 GPT-6 Astra 288.7 GPT-6.1 Sol 651.0 GPT-6 Astra 295.8% GPT-6 Astra 1100.0% GPT-6.1 Sol 589.1% GPT-5.6 Sol 21338 GPT-6 Astra
Qwen 111 745.4 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 387.4 Qwen3.8 Flash 256.0 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 693.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1100.0% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 489.3% Qwen3.7 Max 101276 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Meta 101 448.1 Muse Spark 1.3 679.7 Muse Spark 1.3 355.5 Muse Spark 1.3 594.1% Muse Spark 1.3 599.2% Muse Spark 1.3 688.7% Muse Spark 1.1 11360 Muse Wonder
xAI 001 546.4 Grok 4.7 776.4 Grok 4.6 553.0 Grok 4.6 494.7% Grok 4.6 599.2% Grok 4.6 389.4% Grok 4.6 91289 Grok 4.6
Xiaomi 000 646.3 MiMo-V2.6-Pro 972.6 MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1421.3 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1882.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro Not measured 1384.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro 71308 MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Z.ai 000 844.8 GLM 5.3 873.1 GLM 5.3 453.1 GLM 5.3 1288.1% GLM 5.3 1093.9% GLM 5.3 Flash 1086.9% GLM 5.1 81295 GLM 5.3
StepFun 000 943.7 Step 5 Preview 1071.4 Step 5 Preview Not measured 1783.1% Step 3.5 Flash Not measuredNot measured 151196 Step 3.7 Flash
Moonshot AI 000 1043.6 Kimi K3 1264.7 Kimi K2 0711 750.0 Kimi K3 792.9% Kimi K3 997.2% Kimi K3 788.0% Kimi K3 41335 Kimi K3
inclusionAI 000 1141.1 Ling 3.1 Flash Not measured 1128.7 Ling 3.0 Flash VL 1586.2% Ling 3.0 Flash VL Not measured 1482.0% Ling 3.0 Flash Not measured
DeepSeek 000 1239.5 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 483.3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 847.5 DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 992.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 798.6% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 887.3% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 61312 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Why coding is ranked differently

Coding has four public benchmarks that publish results for the same models, so we can average them into one index and show how many of the four stand behind each score. It also has the only board that publishes what an attempt costs, which is how we compute the cost of a solved task.

Reasoning, math, knowledge and general skill each have one board in our data. A blend of one is that board, so we show it as published, with its date and the limits its publisher states, and keep it out of the coding index. Methodology