Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) leaderboard

Claude Fable 5.1 leads
76.7%
models measured
73
lead over #2
+0.7 pts
median
57.9%

Leader on Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) · read October 22

On October 22, 2026, 73 of our catalog's models had a Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) result, and Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 led with 76.7%, ahead of Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 at 75.9%.

Financial models built in spreadsheets by an agent, graded against set criteria. Share correct, as Vals AI grades it.

Role in the index

Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) is shown as published and does not feed any of our indexes. Read the methodology

73 models with a result

Original board: Vals AI boards
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Cost per test Duration, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 76.7% $15.93 29m 32s 84.2 $50.00
2 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 75.9% $11.02 35m 06s 88.8 $20.00
3 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 75.7% $8.79 36m 45s 87.3 $10.00
4 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 75.2% $11.80 38m 26s 81.0 $10.00
5 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 73.7% $12.35 26m 34s 79.3 $50.00
6 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 73.6% $6.07 25m 59s 83.0 $25.00
7 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 72.3% $6.01 9m 50s 73.5 $20.00
8 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 72.2% $8.24 12m 49s 61.6 $3.75
9 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 71.7% $5.83 13m 24s 85.1 $50.00
10 GPT-6 SolOpenAI 71.5% $1.28 10m 22s 76.0 $10.00
11 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 71.3% $5.69 10m 51s 58.0 $3.75
12 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 70.8% $1.14 18m 28s 82.4 $10.00
13 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 69.4% $12.06 43m 52s 65.0 $25.00
14 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI 68.5% $0.14 17m 21s 57.3 $0.50
15 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 67.1% $0.37 11m 00s 58.0 $1.20
16 Muse WonderMeta 67.1% $5.60 17m 14s 71.9 $20.00
17 Grok 4.7xAI 67.0% $6.48 34m 57s 66.7 $6.00
18 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 66.7% $3.07 12m 21s 62.3 $15.00
19 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 66.3% $10.29 49m 46s 57.7 $10.00
20 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 66.2% $2.19 13m 33s 63.9 $12.00
21 MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi 65.5% $0.11 25m 22s 54.7 $0.28
22 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle 65.4% $3.89 12m 06s 62.5 $3.75
23 GPT-5.5OpenAI 64.5% $3.27 15m 11s 71.3 $30.00
24 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic 63.7% $12.76 38m 36s 67.5 $25.00
25 Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 63.5% $5.17 18m 44s 39.8 $9.00
26 Ember-1Fireworks 63.4% $2.46 31m 07s 52.6 $15.00
27 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi 62.9% $0.33 55m 14s 65.4 $0.87
28 Grok 4.6xAI 62.7% $3.06 52m 59s 65.7 $6.00
29 Muse Spark 1.3Meta 62.7% $3.55 22m 55s 57.4 $4.25
30 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek 61.8% $0.36 16m 47s 70.3 $0.60
31 GLM 5.2Z.ai 61.5% $4.47 58m 52s 61.1 $4.40
32 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic 60.2% $7.23 54m 16s 57.3 $15.00
33 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 60.1% $2.66 57m 47s 62.4 $6.00
34 Qwen3.8 27BQwen 59.7% $4.56 22m 51s 74.2 $2.55
35 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 59.0% $1.15 18m 03s 70.7 $0.50
36 Hy4 previewTencent 58.1% $0.79 30m 39s 44.3 $2.501
37 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI 57.9% $2.20 39m 48s 52.1 $4.00
38 DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek 57.2% $0.23 13m 00s 62.5 $0.84
39 Step 5 PreviewStepFun 57.1% $1.33 43m 35s 61.1 $2.70
40 Qwen3.7 MaxQwen 57.0% $2.86 32m 37s 54.1 $4.425
41 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek 57.0% $0.38 26m 14s 51.8 $0.396
42 Muse Spark 1.2Meta 57.0% $2.31 17m 07s 55.7 $4.25
43 Muse Spark 1.1Meta 56.4% $1.11 14m 52s 70.3 $4.25
44 GLM 5.3Z.ai 56.3% $3.79 36m 12s 70.6 $4.40
45 Mistral Large 4Mistral AI 56.2% $4.84 1h 22m 56.4 $4.18
46 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 55.9% $0.71 1h 15m 57.7 $0.50
47 MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi 55.2% $0.22 29m 08s 31.6 $0.9152
48 MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi 55.1% $0.08 30m 38s 50.0 $0.336
49 Muse Spark OpenMeta 53.7% $5.35 1h 25m 47.4 $4.25
50 Grok 4.5xAI 52.9% $1.55 18m 28s 58.6 $6.00
51 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 52.8% $1.08 37m 27s 56.1 $1.98
52 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 52.6% $3.77 11m 49s 32.3 $12.00
53 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek 51.6% $0.80 13m 42s 38.7 $2.976
54 Qwen3.7 PlusQwen 49.3% $0.60 36m 49s 33.2 $1.28
55 MiniMax M3MiniMax 47.8% $2.09 31m 30s 39.2 $1.20
56 GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI 45.4% $2.15 43m 21s 35.8 $4.50
57 GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI 44.8% $0.57 29m 27s 44.8 $1.25
58 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle 43.2% $1.23 8m 14s 49.0 $2.50
59 T InklingThinking Machines 38.4% $1.67 26m 22s 31.5 $4.05
60 Qwen3.6 PlusQwen 32.9% $2.87 31m 14s 44.1 $1.95
61 T Inkling SmallThinking Machines 31.8% $0.25 19m 34s 27.3 $1.20
62 Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA 31.7% Not published 39m 42s 30.0 $2.40
63 Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI 28.5% $0.79 1h 03m 38.6 $2.85
64 MiniMax M2.7MiniMax 28.4% $1.66 20m 07s 36.2 $1.20
65 Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle 26.0% $0.45 5m 29s 43.7 $3.00
66 Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI 25.0% $0.18 12m 15s 29.6 $0.1215
67 Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic 22.7% $1.03 11m 59s 35.6 $5.00
68 Grok 4.3xAI 18.4% $0.63 4m 32s 37.4 $2.50
69 Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA 17.0% $0.18 39m 19s 22.6 $0.147
70 Grok 4.20xAI 11.7% $0.47 6m 08s 33.3 $2.50
71 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI 11.2% $10.60 51m 22s 25.5 $7.50
72 Mercury 2.5Inception 8.8% $0.42 5m 01s 1.6 $0.15
73 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle 8.6% $0.07 1m 07s 22.7 $1.50

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 137 rows were read from the source on October 22, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Cost per test is what Vals AI reports one test cost on the run behind the result, in US dollars. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.