LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Cybench leaderboard

Claude Opus 4.6 leads
93.0%
models measured
6
lead over #2
+11.0 pts
median
51.0%

Leader on Cybench · read October 21

cybench.py


        # Cybench, read October 21
        leaders = {
            "Claude Opus 4.6": 93.0%,    "Claude Opus 4.5": 82.0%,    "Claude Sonnet 4.5": 60.0%,
        }
      

On October 21, 2026, 6 of our catalog's models had a Cybench result, and Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 led with 93.0%.

Capture-the-flag security tasks from professional competitions, attempted without hints. Share solved.

Role in the index

A coding board we show beside the Vibe Coding Index, not inside it: the index keeps the four boards it was defined on, so a score does not move every time a board is added. Read the methodology

Cybench results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic 93.0% 66.9 $25.00
2 Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic 82.0% 66.8 $25.00
3 Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic 60.0% 59.1 $15.00
4 Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic 42.0% 27.2 $75.00
5 o3 MiniOpenAI 22.5% 52.1 $4.40
6 GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI 12.5% 18.2 $10.00

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 197 rows were read from the source on October 21, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out.