Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

FrontierSWE leaderboard

GPT-6 Astra leads
65.5%
models measured
20
lead over #2
+3.2 pts
median
29.8%

Leader on FrontierSWE · read October 22

frontierswe.py


        # FrontierSWE, read October 22
        leaders = {
            "GPT-6 Astra": 65.5%,    "Claude Opus 5.5": 62.3%,    "Claude Sonnet 5.5": 61.9%,
        }
      

On October 22, 2026, 20 of our catalog's models had a FrontierSWE result, and OpenAI GPT-6 Astra led with 65.5%, ahead of Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 at 62.3%.

Epoch AI collects its results; its benchmarking hub describes the tasks and links the authors.

Role in the index

A coding board we show beside the Vibe Coding Index, not inside it: the index keeps the six boards it was defined on, so a score does not move every time a board is added. Read the methodology

FrontierSWE results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Average cost per task Best of 5 runsHours per task Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 65.5% $1029.65 73.0%12.1 h 85.1 $50.00
2 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 62.3% $98.87 71.5%14.3 h 88.8 $20.00
3 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 61.9% $110.45 71.7%16.0 h 87.3 $10.00
4 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 56.3% $138.55 66.6%11.6 h 84.2 $50.00
5 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 55.0% $129.36 64.3%10.6 h 81.0 $10.00
6 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 52.0% $196.71 60.7%16.1 h 83.0 $25.00
7 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 47.0% $301.28 61.8%15.8 h 79.3 $50.00
8 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 43.8% $20.55 52.8%12.4 h 70.7 $0.50
9 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 32.2% $179.64 44.2%8.6 h 73.5 $20.00
10 GLM 5.3Z.ai 30.2% $97.22 40.6%17.0 h 70.6 $4.40
11 Grok 4.7xAI 29.5% $318.77 41.1%12.1 h 66.7 $6.00
12 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 25.9% $109.71 37.5%18.4 h 62.3 $15.00
13 Muse Spark 1.3Meta 25.8% $243.34 40.9%17.0 h 57.4 $4.25
14 Grok 4.6xAI 25.3% $243.43 37.3%13.8 h 65.7 $6.00
15 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 20.3% $34.14 31.2%7.9 h 58.0 $3.75
16 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 19.6% $38.75 31.6%7.2 h 61.6 $3.75
17 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 18.1% $11.03 28.4%16.4 h 57.7 $0.50
18 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 17.8% $51.27 26.8%19.4 h 62.4 $6.00
19 Muse Spark 1.2Meta 12.0% $27.81 18.4%4.6 h 55.7 $4.25
20 T InklingThinking Machines 4.1% $9.15 10.8%1.2 h 31.5 $4.05

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 215 rows were read from the source on October 22, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Average cost per task is the average spend on one task, in US dollars, as Epoch AI records it beside the result. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.

What the result is made of

FrontierSWE: the parts of each result
Model Result ImplementationPerformanceResearch
OpenAI GPT-6 Astra 65.5% 87.0%48.3%59.1%
Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 62.3% 80.4%45.3%57.3%
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5 61.9% 81.1%48.1%54.5%
Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 56.3% 73.2%43.1%51.3%
Google Gemini 4 Argon 55.0% 74.5%35.0%47.7%
Anthropic Claude Opus 5 52.0% 70.5%37.8%42.5%
Anthropic Claude Fable 5 47.0% 63.7%33.7%40.5%
Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5 43.8% 54.3%28.7%37.5%
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol 32.2% 40.4%22.0%28.2%
Z.ai GLM 5.3 30.2% 34.6%20.6%25.6%
SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 29.5% 36.4%18.2%23.8%
MoonshotAI Kimi K3 25.9% 29.9%18.8%21.1%
Meta Muse Spark 1.3 25.8% 28.8%17.1%22.1%
SpaceXAI Grok 4.6 25.3% 24.6%16.4%25.2%
Google Gemini 3.7 Flash 20.3% 24.9%15.0%14.3%
Google Gemini 3.8 Flash 19.6% 23.0%14.9%16.5%
Z.ai GLM 5.3 Flash 18.1% 19.5%15.8%13.3%
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 17.8% 13.8%16.2%16.0%
Meta Muse Spark 1.2 12.0% 2.6%11.5%14.7%
Thinking Machines Inkling 4.1% 0.4%3.9%5.4%

The parts as Epoch AI benchmarking hub publishes them, for the same run as the result.