Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Code migration (Vals AI) leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
69.8%
models measured
76
lead over #2
+1.7 pts
median
31.0%

Leader on Code migration (Vals AI) · read October 21

code_migration_vals_ai.py


        # Code migration (Vals AI), read October 21
        leaders = {
            "Claude Sonnet 5.5": 69.8%,    "Gemini 4 Argon": 68.2%,    "GPT-6 Astra": 67.7%,
        }
      

On October 21, 2026, 76 of our catalog's models had a Code migration (Vals AI) result, and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5 led with 69.8%, ahead of Google Gemini 4 Argon at 68.2%.

Vals AI's code migration board, run with one shared harness; its page describes the tasks. The score as Vals AI publishes it.

Role in the index

A coding board we show beside the Vibe Coding Index, not inside it: the index keeps the six boards it was defined on, so a score does not move every time a board is added. Read the methodology

76 models with a result

Original board: Vals AI boards
Code migration (Vals AI) results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Cost per test Duration, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 69.8% $75.83 3h 20m 87.3 $10.00
2 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 68.2% $57.82 2h 12m 81.0 $10.00
3 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 67.7% $44.36 58m 30s 85.1 $50.00
4 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 66.7% $112.97 3h 19m 88.8 $20.00
5 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 65.1% $6.51 1h 36m 82.4 $10.00
6 Muse WonderMeta 62.5% $69.54 2h 51m 71.9 $20.00
7 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 57.5% $60.51 2h 51m 83.0 $25.00
8 GPT-6 SolOpenAI 57.2% $15.68 1h 26m 76.0 $10.00
9 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 55.1% $112.10 1h 49m 79.3 $50.00
10 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 54.6% $70.97 4h 20m 84.2 $50.00
11 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 52.9% $24.54 59m 12s 73.5 $20.00
12 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 47.8% $8.13 48m 34s 63.9 $12.00
13 Hy4 previewTencent 47.4% $3.41 2h 13m 44.3 $2.2509
14 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 47.3% $30.51 1h 15m 65.0 $25.00
15 DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek 45.6% $0.94 1h 45m 62.5 $0.78
16 GPT-5.5OpenAI 45.2% $6.44 31m 35s 71.3 $30.00
17 Grok 4.7xAI 44.8% $36.55 1h 09m 66.7 $6.00
18 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 44.6% $6.23 1h 23m 70.7 $0.50
19 Grok 4.6xAI 44.6% $14.58 1h 30m 65.7 $6.00
20 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 44.5% $1.88 58m 35s 58.0 $1.20
21 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 44.4% $35.31 1h 57m 57.7 $10.00
22 GLM 5.3Z.ai 44.2% $24.91 3h 47m 70.6 $4.40
23 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek 44.2% $1.86 2h 11m 70.3 $0.60
24 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic 43.9% $36.39 1h 12m 67.5 $25.00
25 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi 43.0% $0.69 2h 49m 65.4 $0.87
26 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI 42.5% $0.60 50m 23s 57.3 $0.50
27 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 41.5% $18.58 3h 32m 56.1 $1.98
28 MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi 40.9% $0.49 3h 12m 54.7 $0.28
29 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic 39.9% $38.51 1h 40m 57.3 $15.00
30 Step 5 PreviewStepFun 39.0% $7.61 3h 34m 61.1 $2.70
31 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek 38.6% $3.61 2h 08m 51.8 $0.28
32 GLM 5.2Z.ai 37.9% $12.64 1h 54m 61.1 $4.40
33 Grok 4.5xAI 36.6% $3.37 23m 29s 58.6 $6.00
34 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 36.5% $18.49 2h 37m 61.6 $3.75
35 GPT-5.4OpenAI 35.0% $7.76 35m 46s 64.4 $15.00
36 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 34.8% $21.46 2h 39m 58.0 $3.75
37 Ember-1Fireworks 32.5% $51.11 4h 09m 52.6 $15.00
38 Muse Spark 1.1Meta 31.1% $4.56 39m 11s 70.3 $4.25
39 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle 30.9% $8.93 1h 30m 62.5 $3.75
40 Mistral Large 4Mistral AI 30.6% $47.89 4h 51m 56.4 $4.18
41 Muse Spark 1.2Meta 29.9% $3.78 31m 07s 55.7 $4.25
42 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI 27.8% $5.11 1h 30m 52.1 $4.00
43 Muse Spark 1.3Meta 27.6% $4.62 1h 08m 57.4 $4.25
44 Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 26.8% $5.73 19m 28s 39.8 $9.00
45 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek 26.2% $1.07 28m 58s 38.7 $2.716
46 GLM 5.1Z.ai 25.8% $5.70 58m 22s 49.2 $4.40
47 Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI 25.4% $5.04 1h 39m 53.4 $4.00
48 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 24.0% $10.54 4h 28m 62.4 $6.00
49 MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi 21.6% $0.24 48m 53s 31.6 $0.9152
50 Muse Spark OpenMeta 21.2% $9.04 1h 53m 47.4 $4.25
51 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 20.5% $3.13 3h 26m 57.7 $0.50
52 MiniMax M3MiniMax 19.9% $7.07 1h 14m 39.2 $1.20
53 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 17.3% $1.61 12m 01s 32.3 $12.00
54 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 16.1% $13.87 4h 18m 62.3 $15.00
55 GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI 14.5% $0.42 26m 34s 44.8 $1.25
56 MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi 14.2% $0.10 37m 55s 50.0 $0.336
57 Qwen3.8 27BQwen 14.2% $21.68 4h 46m 74.2 $2.55
58 T Inkling SmallThinking Machines 13.7% $0.60 20m 33s 27.3 $1.20
59 Qwen3.7 MaxQwen 13.1% $1.93 25m 32s 54.1 $4.425
60 GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI 12.9% $1.95 28m 53s 35.8 $4.50
61 Qwen3.7 PlusQwen 12.9% $0.42 35m 47s 33.2 $1.28
62 T InklingThinking Machines 11.8% $3.01 29m 34s 31.5 $4.05
63 Qwen3.6 PlusQwen 11.1% $4.78 29m 50s 44.1 $1.95
64 MiniMax M2.7MiniMax 8.7% $0.59 20m 59s 36.2 $1.20
65 Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic 7.5% $0.98 9m 54s 35.6 $5.00
66 Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI 7.0% $0.93 1h 04m 38.6 $2.85
67 Grok 4.3xAI 6.8% $0.42 3m 00s 37.4 $2.50
68 Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle 6.4% $0.34 4m 44s 43.7 $3.00
69 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle 6.2% $0.53 22m 02s 49.0 $2.50
70 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI 5.1% $18.62 3h 38m 25.5 $7.50
71 Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA 4.9% Not published 1h 31m 30.0 $2.40
72 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle 4.6% $0.05 1m 33s 22.7 $1.50
73 Mercury 2.5Inception 4.5% $0.63 16m 14s 1.6 $0.15
74 Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA 3.0% $0.27 43m 25s 22.6 $0.147
75 Grok 4.20xAI 0.3% $0.29 6m 14s 33.3 $2.50
76 Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI 0.0% $0.06 4h 59m 29.6 $0.1215

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 136 rows were read from the source on October 21, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Cost per test is what Vals AI reports one test cost on the run behind the result, in US dollars. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.