Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

FrontierCode 2.0 leaderboard

Claude Fable 5.2 leads
49.1%
models measured
55
lead over #2
+2.7 pts
median
21.6%

Leader on FrontierCode 2.0 · read November 14

frontiercode_2_0.py


        # FrontierCode 2.0, read November 14
        leaders = {
            "Claude Fable 5.2": 49.1%,    "Claude Opus 5.5": 46.4%,    "GPT-6 Astra": 42.4%,
        }
      

On November 14, 2026, 55 of our catalog's models had a FrontierCode 2.0 result, and Anthropic Claude Fable 5.2 led with 49.1%, ahead of Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 at 46.4%.

Software engineering tasks, version 2.0 of FrontierCode. Share solved. Run by Artificial Analysis on its own harness.

Role in the index

A coding board we show beside the Vibe Coding Index, not inside it: the index keeps the six boards it was defined on, so a score does not move every time a board is added. Read the methodology

55 models with a result

Original board: Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode 2.0 results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic 49.1% 87.8 $40.00
2 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 46.4% 87.3 $20.00
3 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 42.4% 83.8 $50.00
4 GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI 42.3% 76.4 $5.00
5 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 41.7% 84.3 $10.00
6 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 40.6% 79.8 $10.00
7 Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle 40.6% 86.6 $10.00
8 Gemini 4 HydrogenGoogle 39.0% 77.9 $7.50
9 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 35.7% 82.8 $50.00
10 GPT-6 SolOpenAI 35.6% 72.1 $10.00
11 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 34.9% 68.4 $0.50
12 Hy4Tencent 31.4% 65.2 $1.2505
13 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 31.2% 81.7 $25.00
14 Grok 4.7xAI 28.7% 64.8 $6.00
15 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek 28.5% 66.9 $0.60
16 Muse WonderMeta 27.9% 71.8 $20.00
17 Muse EmberMeta 27.2% 64.9 $0.50
18 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 25.7% 80.3 $10.00
19 Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI 25.5% 79.0 $10.00
20 T Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines 25.4% 48.9 $1.00
21 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI 25.2% 54.9 $0.50
22 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi 24.0% 61.8 $0.87
23 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 23.9% 63.5 $12.00
24 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 23.4% 67.3 $6.00
25 Muse Spark 1.3Meta 23.1% 56.1 $4.25
26 MiniMax M3MiniMax 21.9% 33.6 $1.20
27 MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi 21.6% 54.8 $0.28
28 GLM 5.3Z.ai 21.6% 68.5 $4.40
29 MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax 20.8% 55.7 $0.60
30 Grok 4.6xAI 19.8% 63.9 $6.00
31 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 18.7% 60.3 $3.75
32 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 17.8% 54.6 $10.00
33 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 17.6% 56.2 $0.50
34 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 17.6% 55.3 $1.20
35 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 17.1% 56.1 $1.98
36 Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAI 17.0% Not benchmarked $0.135
37 Mistral Large 4Mistral AI 15.0% 60.9 $2.10
38 Qwen3.8 27BQwen 14.9% 69.7 $2.55
39 Step 5 PreviewStepFun 12.0% 57.4 $2.70
40 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 10.9% 61.4 $15.00
41 Muse Spark OpenMeta 7.6% 43.4 $4.25
42 Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA 6.1% 14.8 $0.50
43 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle 6.0% 48.9 $2.50
44 T Inkling SmallThinking Machines 4.8% 27.3 $1.20
45 Solar Pro 4Upstage 4.1% Not benchmarked $0.60
46 T InklingThinking Machines 3.9% 29.2 $4.05
47 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI 1.8% 25.4 $7.50
48 Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA 1.1% 30.0 $2.30
49 Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle 0.6% Not benchmarked $1.50
50 Command ACohere 0.0% Not benchmarked $10.00
51 Gemma 4 31BGoogle 0.0% 21.9 $0.40
52 Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite 0.0% Not benchmarked $0.20
53 Mistral Small 4Mistral AI 0.0% Not benchmarked $0.60
54 Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA 0.0% 22.6 $0.18
55 gpt-oss-120bOpenAI 0.0% Not benchmarked $0.45

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 214 rows were read from the source on November 14, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out.