LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

FrontierMath, tier 4 leaderboard

GPT-6.1 Sol leads
100.0%
models measured
64
lead over #2
+2.4 pts
median
28.0%

Leader on FrontierMath, tier 4 · read October 21

On October 21, 2026, 64 of our catalog's models had a FrontierMath, tier 4 result, and OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol led with 100.0%.

The hardest FrontierMath tier, problems that take specialists days. Share solved.

Role in the index

We collect this benchmark and show it as supporting evidence. It is not part of the Vibe Coding Index, because it measures something other than coding and the index is about coding. Read the methodology

FrontierMath, tier 4 results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 100.0% 88.7 $10.00
2 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 97.6% 88.7 $50.00
3 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 95.0% 92.2 $20.00
4 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 90.2% 82.1 $50.00
5 GPT-6 SolOpenAI 90.0% 82.8 $10.00
6 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 87.8% 89.1 $50.00
7 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 82.9% 76.7 $20.00
8 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 80.5% 88.9 $10.00
9 GPT-5.6 Sol ProOpenAI 80.5% Not benchmarked $20.00
10 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 78.0% 80.5 $10.00
11 GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI 78.0% Not benchmarked $180.00
12 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 73.2% 81.8 $25.00
13 GPT-5.5OpenAI 72.5% 67.8 $30.00
14 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 70.7% 69.0 $12.00
15 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 61.0% 61.5 $1.20
16 GPT-5.4 ProOpenAI 58.5% Not benchmarked $180.00
17 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 56.1% 66.0 $25.00
18 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI 56.1% 71.4 $0.50
19 GPT-5.4OpenAI 49.0% 37.7 $15.00
20 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 46.3% 75.9 $0.50
21 Muse Spark 1.3Meta 46.3% 79.7 $4.25
22 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 46.3% 63.5 $6.00
23 GPT-5.2 ProOpenAI 46.0% Not benchmarked $168.00
24 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 39.0% 61.8 $11.936
25 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 36.6% 69.9 $3.75
26 Qwen3.7 MaxQwen 34.1% 45.1 $4.425
27 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic 31.7% 51.1 $25.00
28 Grok 4.6xAI 31.7% 76.4 $6.00
29 GPT-5.2OpenAI 31.7% 58.9 $14.00
30 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 29.3% 63.5 $10.00
31 GLM 5.2Z.ai 29.3% 57.7 $7.00
32 GLM 5.3Z.ai 29.3% 73.1 $1.40
33 Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic 26.8% 66.9 $25.00
34 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 26.8% 54.6 $1.98
35 DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek 26.8% 77.2 $0.525
36 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 26.8% 35.3 $12.00
37 Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 26.8% 42.8 $9.00
38 Mistral Large 4Mistral AI 26.8% 55.3 $4.18
39 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI 25.6% 44.2 $3.41
40 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek 24.4% Not benchmarked $1.32
41 Grok 4.5xAI 24.4% 75.5 $6.00
42 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle 22.0% 48.3 $3.75
43 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 22.0% 70.5 $4.125
44 GPT-5OpenAI 22.0% 72.2 $10.00
45 GPT-5 ProOpenAI 19.5% Not benchmarked $120.00
46 Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle 17.1% 75.8 $3.00
47 Grok 4.7xAI 17.1% 75.0 $6.00
48 T Inkling SmallThinking Machines 17.1% 29.9 $1.20
49 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 17.1% 71.0 $0.50
50 Grok 4.3xAI 14.6% 22.5 $2.50
51 Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI 12.2% 39.1 $3.35
52 GPT-5 MiniOpenAI 12.2% 59.8 $2.00
53 GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI 12.2% Not benchmarked $1.25
54 GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI 9.8% 28.2 $4.50
55 Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic 4.9% 66.8 $25.00
56 o4 MiniOpenAI 4.9% 68.6 $4.40
57 T InklingThinking Machines 4.9% 49.7 $4.05
58 Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic 2.4% 27.2 $75.00
59 Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic 2.4% 59.1 $15.00
60 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek 2.4% 35.3 $1.9105
61 GPT-5 NanoOpenAI 2.4% 34.8 $0.40
62 Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle 0.0% 37.0 $10.00
63 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle 0.0% 33.6 $2.50
64 o3 MiniOpenAI 0.0% 52.1 $4.40

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 197 rows were read from the source on October 21, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out.