Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MedQA (Vals AI) leaderboard

o1 leads
96.5%
models measured
47
lead over #2
+0.1 pts
median
92.5%

Leader on MedQA (Vals AI) · read October 22

On October 22, 2026, 51 of our catalog's models had a MedQA (Vals AI) result, and OpenAI o1 led with 96.5%, ahead of OpenAI GPT-5.1 at 96.4%.

Medical licensing exam questions. Share answered correctly, as run by Vals AI. An archived board.

Role in the index

MedQA (Vals AI) is shown as published and does not feed any of our indexes. Read the methodology

51 models with a result

Original board: Vals AI boards
MedQA (Vals AI) results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Latency, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 o1OpenAI 96.5% 11 s Not benchmarked $60.00
2 GPT-5.1OpenAI 96.4% 12 s 40.4 $10.00
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 96.4% 39 s 32.3 $12.00
4 GPT-5OpenAI 96.3% 36 s 38.8 $10.00
5 GPT-5.4OpenAI 96.1% 23 s 64.4 $15.00
6 GPT-5 MiniOpenAI 96.1% 16 s 34.2 $2.00
7 o3OpenAI 96.1% 8.5 s Not benchmarked $8.00
8 o4 MiniOpenAI 96.0% 6.6 s Not benchmarked $4.40
9 Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic 95.9% 32 s 44.0 $25.00
10 Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle 95.8% 26 s 43.7 $3.00
11 Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic 95.4% 30 s 57.2 $25.00
12 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen 95.2% 52 s 39.5 $1.80
13 o3 MiniOpenAI 94.8% 8.4 s Not benchmarked $4.40
14 Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic 94.7% 36 s 39.5 $15.00
15 Grok 4.20xAI 94.5% 12 s 33.3 $2.50
16 Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI 94.4% 42 s 38.6 $2.85
17 GLM 5Z.ai 94.3% 1m 21s 41.7 $3.20
18 GPT-5.2OpenAI 94.1% 19 s 55.9 $14.00
19 DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek 93.9% 54 s 30.0 $0.88
20 GLM 4.7Z.ai 93.7% 1m 06s 55.1 $2.20
21 Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic 93.6% 24 s Not benchmarked $75.00
22 GPT-5 NanoOpenAI 93.3% 20 s Not benchmarked $0.40
23 Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI 92.6% 3m 45s Not benchmarked $2.50
24 MiniMax M2.5MiniMax 92.5% 34 s 37.2 $1.20
25 GLM 4.6Z.ai 92.2% 29 s 8.8 $2.20
26 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic 92.1% 35 s 57.3 $15.00
27 gpt-oss-120bOpenAI 91.4% 12 s Not benchmarked $0.50
28 GPT-4.1OpenAI 91.2% 3.1 s Not benchmarked $8.00
29 MiniMax M2.1MiniMax 91.2% 36 s Not benchmarked $1.20
30 R1RetiredDeepSeek 90.8% 42 s Not benchmarked $2.50
31 GLM 4.5Z.ai 90.0% 60 s Not benchmarked $2.20
32 Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle 88.9% 15 s Not benchmarked $0.40
33 GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI 88.2% 3.4 s Not benchmarked $10.00
34 GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI 84.6% 1.9 s Not benchmarked $1.60
35 Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI 84.0% 11 s Not benchmarked $2.30
36 Grok 3RetiredxAI 83.8% 7.5 s Not benchmarked $15.00
37 gpt-oss-20bOpenAI 82.9% 25 s Not benchmarked $0.15
38 Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI 82.2% 17 s Not benchmarked $1.50
39 DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek 82.0% 13 s Not benchmarked $1.07
40 GPT-4 TurboOpenAI 82.0% 8.4 s Not benchmarked $30.00
41 Gemini 2.0 FlashRetiredGoogle 81.5% 1.9 s Not benchmarked $0.40
42 Command ACohere 80.5% 2.9 s Not benchmarked $10.00
43 Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic 79.6% 24 s 35.6 $5.00
44 Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI 78.2% 7.3 s Not benchmarked $2.00
45 Gemini 1.5 ProRetiredGoogle 76.5% 5.9 s Not benchmarked $5.00
46 Mistral LargeMistral AI 76.2% 4.9 s Not benchmarked $6.00
47 GPT-4o-miniOpenAI 72.4% 2.3 s Not benchmarked $0.60
48 GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI 68.2% 1.4 s Not benchmarked $0.40
49 GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI 58.5% 1.6 s Not benchmarked $1.50
50 Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama 50.9% 4.8 s Not benchmarked $0.50
51 Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama 43.3% 7.8 s Not benchmarked $1.00

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 137 rows were read from the source on October 22, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.