LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MMLU Pro leaderboard

Claude Fable 5.1 leads
92.4%
models measured
92
lead over #2
+0.8 pts
median
86.0%

Leader on MMLU Pro · read October 21

On October 21, 2026, 92 of our catalog's models had a MMLU Pro result, and Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 led with 92.4%.

MMLU Pro is over 12,000 multiple-choice questions across 14 subjects, from law and history to physics, each with ten options instead of four. The number is the share answered correctly, as run by Vals AI.

Role in the index

Limit: The top of the board is close together: when we read it on October 15, 2026, the five leading models all scored above 90%.

We collect this benchmark and show it as supporting evidence. It is not part of the Vibe Coding Index, because it measures something other than coding and the index is about coding. Read the methodology

Top 10 of 92 models with a result

Full MMLU Pro ranking
MMLU Pro results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Latency, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 92.4% 21 s 89.1 $50.00
2 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 91.6% 9.6 s 81.8 $25.00
3 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 91.5% 25 s 82.1 $50.00
4 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 91.0% 24 s 35.3 $12.00
5 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 90.2% 7.8 s 70.5 $4.125
6 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 90.1% 4.2 s 69.9 $3.75
7 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic 89.9% 3m 08s 51.1 $25.00
8 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 89.6% 23 s 66.0 $25.00
9 Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 89.5% 26 s 42.8 $9.00
10 Grok 4.6xAI 89.4% 55 s 76.4 $6.00

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 92 rows were read from the source on October 21, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.

Cheapest good model on MMLU Pro · Best open-weight model on MMLU Pro