LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Best LLM for terminal and DevOps tasks

Claude Opus 5.5 leads
65.2%
models ranked
48
lead over #2
+1.0 pts

Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) · read October 21

terminal_bench_4_vals_ai.py


        # Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), read October 21
        leaders = {
            "Claude Opus 5.5": 65.2%,    "Claude Sonnet 5.5": 64.1%,    "GPT-6 Astra": 59.6%,
        }
      

As of October 21, 2026, Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 leads 48 models on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) with 65.2%, ahead of Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5 (64.1%) and OpenAI GPT-6 Astra (59.6%).

This list narrows the best LLM for coding ranking.

Top 20 of 48, higher is better

Embed this data
Best LLM for terminal and DevOps tasks
Rank Model Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) Coding evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
65.2%
92.2 $20.00
2
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
64.1%
88.9 $10.00
3
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
59.6%
88.7 $50.00
4
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
58.1%
89.1 $50.00
5
57.6%
80.5 $10.00
6
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
55.0%
88.7 $10.00
7
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
53.5%
81.8 $25.00
8
49.5%
64.5 $20.00
9
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
44.4%
82.8 $10.00
10
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
41.4%
82.1 $50.00
11
GLM 5.3 Z.ai
38.9%
73.1 $1.40
12
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
37.9%
76.7 $20.00
13
37.4%
71.0 $0.50
14
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
36.4%
75.9 $0.50
15
34.3%
63.5 $6.00
16
31.8%
83.3 $0.60
17
Step 5 Preview StepFun
31.8%
71.4 $2.70
18
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi
31.3%
72.6 $0.87
19
Grok 4.7 xAI
28.8%
75.0 $6.00
20
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
27.8%
55.3 $4.18

How this list is built

Generated from the dataset on every refresh. Nobody picks the order by hand.

Models by their Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) result, as the board publishes it, best first. Tasks finished in a real terminal with one shared harness, run by Vals AI. Share completed.

Other lists

Rankings beyond coding · Methodology