Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Best LLM for fixing GitHub issues

Claude Opus 5 leads
97.0%
models ranked
76
lead over #2
+0.6 pts

SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) · read October 21

swe_bench_verified_vals_ai.py


        # SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI), read October 21
        leaders = {
            "Claude Opus 5": 97.0%,    "DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813": 96.4%,    "GPT-5.6 Sol": 96.2%,
        }
      

As of October 21, 2026, Anthropic Claude Opus 5 leads 76 models on SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) with 97.0%, ahead of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (96.4%) and OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (96.2%).

The full best LLM for coding ranking combines this benchmark with others.

Top 20 of 76, higher is better

Embed this data
Best LLM for fixing GitHub issues
Rank Model SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) Coding evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
97.0%
83.0 $25.00
2
96.4%
56.1 $1.98
3
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
96.2%
73.5 $20.00
4
Grok 4.6 xAI
95.6%
65.7 $6.00
5
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
95.4%
63.9 $12.00
6
GLM 5.3 Z.ai
95.4%
70.6 $4.40
7
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
95.0%
79.3 $50.00
8
Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
93.4%
62.3 $15.00
9
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
93.0%
58.0 $1.20
10
92.0%
57.7 $0.50
11
88.8%
51.8 $0.28
12
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
88.6%
65.0 $25.00
13
86.6%
55.7 $4.25
14
Grok 4.5 xAI
86.6%
58.6 $6.00
15
86.0%
74.2 $2.55
16
85.6%
62.4 $6.00
17
GLM 5.2 Z.ai
82.8%
61.1 $4.40
18
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
82.6%
71.3 $30.00
19
T Inkling Small Thinking Machines
82.2%
27.3 $1.20
20
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
82.0%
67.5 $25.00

How this list is built

Generated from the dataset on every refresh. Nobody picks the order by hand.

Models by their SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) result, as the board publishes it, best first. Real GitHub issues fixed with one shared agent harness, run by Vals AI; current models that the swebench.com board has not caught up with. Share resolved.

Other lists

Rankings beyond coding · Methodology