Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MedScribe (Vals AI) leaderboard

Claude Opus 5.5 leads
91.4%
models measured
85
lead over #2
+0.1 pts
median
83.0%

Leader on MedScribe (Vals AI) · read October 22

  1. 91.4% Claude Opus 5.5
  2. 91.3% Claude Fable 5.1
  3. 91.1% Claude Sonnet 5.5

On October 22, 2026, 85 of our catalog's models had a MedScribe (Vals AI) result, and Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 led with 91.4%, ahead of Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 at 91.3%.

Writing clinical SOAP notes, graded section by section. The score as Vals AI publishes it.

Role in the index

MedScribe (Vals AI) is shown as published and does not feed any of our indexes. Read the methodology

85 models with a result

Original board: Vals AI boards
MedScribe (Vals AI) results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Latency, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 91.4% 7m 22s 88.8 $20.00
2 Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic 91.3% 3m 08s 84.2 $50.00
3 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 91.1% 5m 07s 87.3 $10.00
4 Claude Opus 5Anthropic 91.0% 1m 17s 83.0 $25.00
5 Muse Spark 1.2Meta 90.1% 1m 01s 55.7 $4.25
6 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 89.5% 5m 23s 70.7 $0.50
7 Grok 4.7xAI 89.4% 2m 33s 66.7 $6.00
8 GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai 88.9% 1m 27s 57.7 $0.50
9 Muse Spark 1.1Meta 88.9% 1m 03s 70.3 $4.25
10 GLM 5.3Z.ai 88.8% 2m 02s 70.6 $4.40
11 Claude Fable 5Anthropic 88.5% 1m 59s 79.3 $50.00
12 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi 88.3% 2m 53s 65.4 $0.87
13 GPT-5.1OpenAI 88.1% 1m 18s 40.4 $10.00
14 Kimi K3Moonshot AI 88.0% 38 s 62.3 $15.00
15 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 87.9% 2m 34s 85.1 $50.00
16 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 87.4% 1m 27s 81.0 $10.00
17 MiniMax M3MiniMax 87.3% 2m 04s 39.2 $1.20
18 Grok 4.5xAI 86.9% 11m 45s 58.6 $6.00
19 GPT-5.5OpenAI 86.9% 2m 13s 71.3 $30.00
20 Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic 86.7% 54 s 57.2 $25.00
21 Grok 4.6xAI 86.5% 1m 11s 65.7 $6.00
22 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 86.5% 2m 50s 82.4 $10.00
23 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic 85.8% 1m 22s 65.0 $25.00
24 DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek 85.5% 54 s 62.5 $0.84
25 T InklingThinking Machines 85.4% 4m 05s 31.5 $4.05
26 Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic 85.3% 1m 12s 44.0 $25.00
27 MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi 85.3% 1m 14s 54.7 $0.28
28 Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic 85.2% 1m 06s 35.6 $5.00
29 GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI 85.2% 1m 34s 73.5 $20.00
30 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen 85.0% 4m 11s 62.4 $6.00
31 Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic 84.5% 44 s 39.5 $15.00
32 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle 84.5% 21 s 61.6 $3.75
33 GPT-5.2OpenAI 84.4% 2m 06s 55.9 $14.00
34 GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI 84.4% 1m 57s 58.0 $1.20
35 T Inkling SmallThinking Machines 84.1% 3m 50s 27.3 $1.20
36 Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle 83.9% 17 s 58.0 $3.75
37 Qwen3.8 27BQwen 83.8% 1m 30s 74.2 $2.55
38 MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi 83.7% 1m 31s 31.6 $0.9152
39 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI 83.7% 2m 50s 57.3 $0.50
40 GPT-5OpenAI 83.7% 3m 05s 38.8 $10.00
41 Hy4 previewTencent 83.6% 5m 50s 44.3 $2.501
42 GLM 5.2Z.ai 83.5% 2m 18s 61.1 $4.40
43 Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle 83.0% 23 s Not benchmarked $2.50
44 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic 83.0% 1m 08s 67.5 $25.00
45 GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI 82.9% 36 s 63.9 $12.00
46 GPT-6 SolOpenAI 82.0% 1m 21s 76.0 $10.00
47 Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI 80.9% 12 s 29.6 $0.1215
48 MiniMax M2.1MiniMax 80.8% 53 s Not benchmarked $1.20
49 GPT-5 MiniOpenAI 80.6% 4m 36s 34.2 $2.00
50 Mistral Large 4Mistral AI 80.4% 2m 05s 56.4 $4.18
51 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek 80.4% 1m 18s 51.8 $0.396
52 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek 80.2% 2m 36s 56.1 $1.98
53 MiniMax M2.7MiniMax 79.9% 27 s 36.2 $1.20
54 Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle 79.7% 34 s 62.5 $3.75
55 Qwen3.7 MaxQwen 79.4% 1m 48s 54.1 $4.425
56 Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI 78.2% 8m 14s 52.1 $4.00
57 GPT-5.4OpenAI 77.5% 4m 43s 64.4 $15.00
58 GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI 77.1% 21 s 44.8 $1.25
59 Qwen3.6 PlusQwen 77.0% 2m 54s 44.1 $1.95
60 o3OpenAI 76.7% 46 s Not benchmarked $8.00
61 Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle 76.6% 57 s 39.8 $9.00
62 Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI 76.4% 2m 27s 38.6 $2.85
63 Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle 76.1% 1m 09s 32.3 $12.00
64 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic 76.0% 4m 12s 57.7 $10.00
65 Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle 75.8% 4.5 s Not benchmarked $0.40
66 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek 75.1% 5m 46s 38.7 $2.976
67 Grok 4.3xAI 74.4% 1m 40s 37.4 $2.50
68 Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic 73.9% 57 s Not benchmarked $75.00
69 Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle 73.5% 36 s 19.1 $10.00
70 GPT-5 NanoOpenAI 72.9% 1m 53s Not benchmarked $0.40
71 GLM 5.1Z.ai 72.3% 1m 36s 49.2 $4.40
72 MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi 72.2% 20 s 50.0 $0.336
73 Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle 70.9% 19 s 49.0 $2.50
74 Qwen3.5-FlashQwen 70.6% 1m 20s 41.1 $0.26
75 Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle 69.9% 23 s 43.7 $3.00
76 o4 MiniOpenAI 69.1% 1m 22s Not benchmarked $4.40
77 GLM 4.7Z.ai 68.6% 2m 47s 55.1 $2.20
78 Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI 67.7% 1m 44s 25.5 $7.50
79 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle 63.9% 17 s 22.7 $1.50
80 Grok 4.20xAI 63.4% 19 s 33.3 $2.50
81 Command ACohere 55.7% 3m 23s Not benchmarked $10.00
82 Mercury 2.5Inception 55.1% 10.0 s 1.6 $0.15
83 Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama 54.2% 25 s Not benchmarked $1.00
84 Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama 50.6% 11 s Not benchmarked $0.50
85 Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA 4.3% 1m 46s 22.6 $0.147

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 137 rows were read from the source on October 22, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.