Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Vals Index leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
70.8%
models measured
21
lead over #2
+0.7 pts
median
57.8%

Leader on Vals Index · read October 22

  1. 70.8% Claude Sonnet 5.5
  2. 70.2% Claude Opus 5.5
  3. 69.2% Gemini 4 Argon

On October 22, 2026, 21 of our catalog's models had a Vals Index result, and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5 led with 70.8%, ahead of Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 at 70.2%.

The Vals Index from vals.ai is a composite over many kinds of professional tasks. It measures general capability, not coding.

Role in the index

Vals Index is shown as published and does not feed any of our indexes. Read the methodology

Top 10 of 21 models with a result

Full Vals Index ranking
Vals Index results for models in the catalog
# Model Result Cost per test Duration, as printed Evidence Coding index Output $/Mtok
1 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic 70.8% $18.70 1h 26m 87.3 $10.00
2 Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic 70.2% $28.12 1h 25m 88.8 $20.00
3 Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle 69.2% $13.37 44m 58s 81.0 $10.00
4 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI 65.0% $21.28 33m 39s 85.1 $50.00
5 Muse WonderMeta 64.9% $10.65 35m 24s 71.9 $20.00
6 GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI 63.9% $3.61 44m 24s 82.4 $10.00
7 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek 61.3% $0.66 39m 55s 70.3 $0.60
8 GLM 5.3Z.ai 59.7% $8.52 1h 04m 70.6 $4.40
9 Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic 58.7% $3.17 49m 48s 70.7 $0.50
10 Grok 4.7xAI 58.6% $11.63 33m 34s 66.7 $6.00

Only models in our catalog are listed, and each appears once with its best published run. 21 rows were read from the source on October 22, 2026, and rows that match no catalog model are left out. Cost per test is what Vals AI reports one test cost on the run behind the result, in US dollars. Every other column is a figure the board publishes for the same run.

Cheapest good model on Vals Index · Best open-weight model on Vals Index