LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M2.5

Updated October 21, 2026. 49 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
Coding
88.7
Overall
52.7
Output $/M
$50.00
49
MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
Coding
59.4
Overall
22.8
Output $/M
$0.95
0
vs boards won of 49 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-6 Astra for coding: it scores 88.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 59.4 for MiniMax M2.5.

Pick MiniMax M2.5 when output tokens cost 52.6x less.

Shared results
49
GPT-6 Astra only
70
MiniMax M2.5 only
18
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Astra 88.7 from 2 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.5 59.4 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 97.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vending-Bench 2: GPT-6 Astra $15,515 against MiniMax M2.5 -$23, 97.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6 Astra $50.00 against MiniMax M2.5 $0.95 per million output tokens, 52.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Astra takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2.5 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 AstraBarsMiniMax M2.5Ties
Coding70
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning70
Math30
Knowledge40
Web design70
General180
All shared boards490
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured75.8%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured68.3%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveBench coding93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena WebDev17741386GPT-6 Astra
AA Coding Index76.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured74.2%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)89.6%14.8%GPT-6 Astra
Code migration (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)5.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
IOI (Vals AI)100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)27.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)41.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
SciCode56.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured42.7%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
FrontierCode53.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierSWE65.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
GSO-Bench79.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
WeirdML93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
MirrorCode46.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
ALE-Bench2951.3618.2GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: coding14891380GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: software and IT14741383GPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev: React17981374GPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev: HTML17751414GPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev: from an image1726Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index52.722.8GPT-6 Astra
Epoch Capabilities Index168.8146.6GPT-6 Astra
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index51.0Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1372Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1357Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1312Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1348Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1245Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1380Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench research85.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench long agentic82.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)56.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)39.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)7.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)62.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Vals Science Index65.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)19.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.3%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
APEX-Agents64.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Remote Labor Index20.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
BALROG68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
SpireClimb25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Vending-Bench 2$15,515-$23GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured82.1%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning92.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)53.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)96.3%84.8%GPT-6 Astra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)54.7%20.5%GPT-6 Astra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
ARC-AGI98.5%63.7%GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI-295.0%4.9%GPT-6 Astra
Chess puzzles74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Mystery game puzzles84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
EBR-bench76.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14631372GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: expert14891378GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14641384GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision: diagrams1297Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
AIMENot measured88.8%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 393.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierMath, tier 497.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
ProofBench99.0%4.0%GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: math14651378GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: mathematical work14841378GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured80.1%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.0%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured53.5%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.6%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured68.2%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured92.5%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
SimpleQA Verified75.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: science14511369GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14251357GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: legal and government14621366GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: business and finance14391356GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites13371222GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: UI components13941172GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: game dev14741176GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: data viz13351171GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: 3D15011170GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: all code categories13791207GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: SVG14311147GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: ASCII art1359Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench design82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
Vals Index65.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench data analysis83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
SAGE (Vals AI)46.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
IFBenchNot measured71.6%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%73.3%GPT-6 Astra
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMCA64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
CL-benchNot measured11.4%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
Furniture assembly80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured6.3%Only MiniMax M2.5 measured
LMArena Text14411359GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: instruction following14551353GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: creative writing14201331GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision1280Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: English14471380GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: non-English14321338GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Chinese14891393GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: German14591361GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Japanese14051171GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Korean14281233GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: French14321363GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Spanish14221353GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Russian14381359GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Polish14221334GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: multi-turn14471364GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: longer queries14601366GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: writing and language14371345GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14271329GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision: English1280Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1361Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1292Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1286Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Astra$0.035Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.5$0.0007Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Astra$0.650Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.5$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Astra$2.50Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.5$0.064Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Astra and MiniMax M2.5
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 AstraMiniMax M2.5
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 4, 2026February 12, 2026
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$10.00$0.27
Output $/Mtok$50.00$0.95
Coding index88.759.4
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.62
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Astra better than MiniMax M2.5 for coding?

Pick GPT-6 Astra for coding: it scores 88.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 59.4 for MiniMax M2.5. Pick MiniMax M2.5 when output tokens cost 52.6x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M2.5?

GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.27 and $0.95. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Astra or MiniMax M2.5?

GPT-6 Astra, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M2.5 comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-6 Astra's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-minimax-minimax-m2-5" title="GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M2.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-minimax-minimax-m2-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6 Astra vs MiniMax M2.5</a></p>