Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 4 Carbon leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro on coding, 86.6 to 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 7.5x less per output token ($1.335 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 4 Carbon or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.5 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($1.335 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 37
- Gemini 4 Carbon only
- 36
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 36
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 86.6 against 31.5.
4 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Carbon has a AA Intelligence Index result, 60.0.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a AA Agentic Index result, 21.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a GPQA Diamond result, 82.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a MMLU Pro result, 84.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 1319 against 1262.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Carbon has a Vals Index result, 70.5%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 4 Carbon $0.0070, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.0011 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the number, $0.03.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.5 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 40.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Gemini 4 Carbon 63.1% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 0.5%, 83.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $1.335 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.02M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 4 Carbon | Bars | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 9 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 12 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 36 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 91.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1768 | 1479 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 60.2 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.3% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 63.1% | 0.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 89.1% | 34.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 21.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.3% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 50.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 65.2% | 0.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| FrontierSWE | 61.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2374.7 | 899.8 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1564 | 1501 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1552 | 1495 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1792 | 1468 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1770 | 1471 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GameBench 2 | Not measured | 37.7 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 60.0 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 169.8 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 21.3 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1284 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1224 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench research | 92.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 72.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 11.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 15.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 17.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 94.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| APEX-Agents | 84.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $16,484 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 82.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 90.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 86.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 35.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 96.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| SimpleBench | 92.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Chess puzzles | 78.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 73.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| EBR-bench | 87.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1551 | 1485 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1582 | 1502 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1545 | 1494 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 90.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 95.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 22.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1481 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1538 | 1493 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MathArena | 85.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.4% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.8% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 53.5 | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 77.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1535 | 1482 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1525 | 1473 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1542 | 1475 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1520 | 1467 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 78.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| PRBench Legal | 53.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1319 | 1262 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1357 | 1243 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1326 | 1264 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1257 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1434 | 1232 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1348 | 1261 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1184 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1151 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LiveBench design | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index121
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 70.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 86.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.3% | 79.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| GDPval-AA | 1733 | 1128 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| DTBench | Not measured | 84.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 29.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Furniture assembly | 77.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text | 1538 | 1464 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1539 | 1476 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1533 | 1437 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: English | 1530 | 1477 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1534 | 1448 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1613 | 1507 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1457 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1409 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1439 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1487 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1469 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1560 | 1450 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1461 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1569 | 1476 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1549 | 1481 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1542 | 1451 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1527 | 1437 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| EQ-Bench 4 | Not measured | 1198 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 4 Carbon | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Xiaomi | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | November 10, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.02M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $0.4575 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $1.335 |
| Coding index | 86.6 | 31.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.03 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.5 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($1.335 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $1.335. Cost per solved task is known for MiMo-V2.5-Pro only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?
37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.