Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Updated October 21, 2026. 60 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding: it scores 49.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when output tokens cost 8.2x less, or when a solved task costs $0.03 against $0.56.
- Shared results
- 60
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 34
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 10
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 49.8 against 40.0.
3 and 1 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 26.0 against 16.9.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 21.3 against 8.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 82.6% against 72.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a AIME result, 82.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 84.6% against 78.7%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 1267 against 1122.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 $0.0035, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.0006 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 $0.56, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Haiku 4.5 49.8 from 3 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 40.0 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Coding, 18.4 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Claude Haiku 4.5 41.2% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 81.3%, 40.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.609 per million output tokens, 8.2x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Bars | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 11 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 5 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 7 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 8 | ||
| General | 2 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 4 | 56 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index011
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | 48.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1480 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 43.9 | 60.2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 41.2% | 81.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 66.6% | 74.0% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 11.4% | 34.1% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 7.5% | 21.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 43.8% | 57.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| SciCode | Not measured | 50.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 899.8 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1454 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1439 | 1495 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1326 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1318 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 16.9 | 26.0 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.2 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 8.0 | 21.3 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LiveBench research | 42.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 11.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 31.0% | 41.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 5.9% | 11.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 10.6% | 15.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 22.7% | 55.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 94.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| BALROG | 31.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $459 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 72.2% | 82.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LiveBench reasoning | 61.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 46.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 86.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 35.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 71.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 47.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 8.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1421 | 1486 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1443 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1435 | 1494 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 82.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 22.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| MATH level 5 | 96.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1398 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1430 | 1491 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 78.7% | 84.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 81.2% | 77.1% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 56.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.6% | 61.4% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 67.5% | 73.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 62.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 79.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 32.7% | 32.5% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1406 | 1482 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1394 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1400 | 1474 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1400 | 1466 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1122 | 1267 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1100 | 1248 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1097 | 1261 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1124 | 1257 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1072 | 1244 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1115 | 1266 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1025 | 1181 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1139 | 1157 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LiveBench design | 59.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index218
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 59.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 54.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.2% | 83.7% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 42.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 79.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| DTBench | 73.6% | 84.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMCA | 30.9% | 29.5% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1414 | 1475 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1371 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: English | 1414 | 1477 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1377 | 1448 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1418 | 1507 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: German | 1374 | 1459 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1338 | 1410 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1346 | 1435 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: French | 1411 | 1487 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1421 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1381 | 1449 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1343 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1409 | 1476 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1427 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1386 | 1451 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1369 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 15, 2025 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.3045 |
| Output $/Mtok | $5.00 | $0.609 |
| Coding index | 49.8 | 40.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.56 | $0.03 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding: it scores 49.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when output tokens cost 8.2x less, or when a solved task costs $0.03 against $0.56.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.3045 and $0.609. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.56 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?
60 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.