Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Kimi K2.7 Code leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro on coding, 53.4 to 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 4.4x less per output token ($0.9152 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.
Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $4.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $0.35).
- Shared results
- 27
- Kimi K2.7 Code only
- 24
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 43
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 53.4 against 31.6.
4 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 26.0 against 25.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 21.3 against 21.0.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a GPQA Diamond result, 82.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a MMLU Pro result, 84.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 1266 against 1263.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Kimi K2.7 Code $0.0029, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Kimi K2.7 Code $0.35, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- General, 8.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- IFBench: Kimi K2.7 Code 63.1% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 79.9%, 16.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.9152 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
- Context window
- Kimi K2.7 Code takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Kimi K2.7 Code | Bars | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 8 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 6 | ||
| General | 0 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 11 | 16 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index84
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1474 | 1480 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 60.8 | 60.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 82.0% | 81.3% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 78.2% | 74.0% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 47.2% | 34.1% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 25.4% | 21.6% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 67.0% | 57.3% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 50.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| SciCode | 47.8% | 50.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 44.7% | 43.2% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| ALE-Bench | 886.2 | 899.8 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1501 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1495 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1475 | 1469 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1451 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1513 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 25.8 | 26.0 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.1 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 21.0 | 21.3 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1176 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1175 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1143 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1138 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1147 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1130 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1151 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1129 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 90.1% | 94.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,083 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 82.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.6% | 86.6% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 35.0% | 35.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 87.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| Chess puzzles | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1486 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1501 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1494 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 54.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 12.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 22.0% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1481 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1491 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.6% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.4% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.8% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1482 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1473 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1474 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1466 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1263 | 1266 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1255 | 1246 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1220 | 1261 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1227 | 1257 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1240 | 1243 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1252 | 1265 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1176 | 1181 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1196 | 1156 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.7% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| IFBench | 63.1% | 79.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.3% | 79.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| DTBench | Not measured | 84.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 29.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1464 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1475 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1438 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1477 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1448 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1507 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1459 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1410 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1435 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1487 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1469 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1449 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1464 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1476 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1481 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1451 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1438 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | June 12, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.95 | $0.4575 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.9152 |
| Coding index | 53.4 | 31.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.35 | $0.03 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 4.4x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $4.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $0.35).
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $0.9152. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.35 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?
27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.