Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Fable 5.2 leads Claude Haiku 4.5 on coding, 87.8 to 31.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 8.0x less per output token ($5.00 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic
Coding
87.8
Overall
91.7
Output $/M
$40.00
22
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
31.4
Overall
40.0
Output $/M
$5.00
0
vs boards won of 22 shared

Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Haiku 4.5: which to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.4 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($5.00 vs $40.00 per million).

Shared results
22
Claude Fable 5.2 only
46
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
70
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 31.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 80.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Claude Fable 5.2 93.8% against Claude Haiku 4.5 4.0%, 89.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5.2BarsClaude Haiku 4.5Ties
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work20
Reasoning40
Math10
Knowledge10
Web design50
General20
All shared boards220
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured66.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured64.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena WebDev18381330Claude Fable 5.2
AA Coding IndexNot measured43.9Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)65.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)93.8%11.4%Claude Fable 5.2
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured7.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)19.0%0.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)62.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SciCode67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)61.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
FrontierCode 2.049.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured35.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
FrontierSWE69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured45.4%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench2509.8Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1453Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1439Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React19151326Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena WebDev: HTML17381318Claude Fable 5.2
GameBench 299.1Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.0Not measured35.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CursorBench 4.060.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ProgramBenchNot measured0.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index64.67.4Claude Fable 5.2
Epoch Capabilities Index173.4142.8Claude Fable 5.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured8.0Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1402Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1325Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1434Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench research94.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench browser86.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured31.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%5.9%Claude Fable 5.2
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)46.1%10.6%Claude Fable 5.2
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)5.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured22.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vals Science Index63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
APEX-Agents80.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Remote Labor Index41.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
BALROGNot measured31.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured45.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SpireClimb15.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$459Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured68.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured40.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured72.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured46.1%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)74.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)76.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.9%71.2%Claude Fable 5.2
ARC-AGI98.5%47.7%Claude Fable 5.2
ARC-AGI-293.8%4.0%Claude Fable 5.2
SimpleBench94.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Chess puzzles79.0%8.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Mystery game puzzles90.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
EBR-bench90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1420Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1443Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1435Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)72.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GoBench2566Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
AIMENot measured82.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.7%66.7%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 395.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ProofBench100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MATH level 5Not measured96.4%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1397Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1429Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MathArena82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured78.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured56.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured67.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured62.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured79.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA-Omniscience66.8Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SimpleQA Verified94.0%13.2%Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1406Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1394Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1400Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1399Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
PRBench Finance47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
PRBench Legal49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
Design Arena: websites13511114Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: UI components13711090Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: game dev13961086Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1121Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D15171052Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: all code categories13731104Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1015Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1135Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design85.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
Vals Index71.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench data analysis81.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured42.9%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GDPval-AA1831Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
DTBench99.2%73.6%Claude Fable 5.2
LMCA70.6%30.9%Claude Fable 5.2
Furniture assembly90.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ExploitBenchNot measured13.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1396Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1414Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1371Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1414Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1376Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1418Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1373Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1340Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1344Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1411Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1422Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1381Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1343Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1409Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1426Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1386Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1369Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1420Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured50.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1053Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Haiku 4.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Haiku 4.5
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5
MakerAnthropicAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026October 15, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$8.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$40.00$5.00
Coding index87.831.4
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding?

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.4 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($5.00 vs $40.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 and $5.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Claude Fable 5.2, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Claude Haiku 4.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-claude-haiku-4-5" title="Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-claude-haiku-4-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5</a></p>