GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling 2 Small
GPT-5.6 Luna leads Inkling 2 Small on coding, 55.3 to 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling 2 Small costs 1.2x less per output token ($1.00 vs $1.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling 2 Small: which to pick
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for coding: it scores 55.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Inkling 2 Small.
Pick Inkling 2 Small for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 44
- GPT-5.6 Luna only
- 81
- Inkling 2 Small only
- 7
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna scores 55.3 against 48.9.
5 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Inkling 2 Small
Inkling 2 Small leads, 30.6 against 23.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a AA Agentic Index result, 42.1.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a GPQA Diamond result, 91.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a MMLU Pro result, 86.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a Design Arena: websites result, 1248.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Inkling 2 Small has a Vals Index result, 56.1%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
No call
GPT-5.6 Luna $0.0008, Inkling 2 Small $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has the number, $0.04.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.6 Luna 55.3 from 5 benchmarks, Inkling 2 Small 48.9 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 8.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI-2: GPT-5.6 Luna 59.5% against Inkling 2 Small 81.7%, 22.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.6 Luna $1.20 against Inkling 2 Small $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Inkling 2 Small 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.6 Luna | Bars | Inkling 2 Small | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 7 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 7 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 1 | ||
| General | 11 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 19 | 25 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index48
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1519 | 1647 | Inkling 2 Small |
| AA Coding Index | 71.4 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 93.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 11.6% | 12.6% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 77.1% | 81.5% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | Inkling 2 Small |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 61.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 79.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.1% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 22.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 60.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 73.6% | 72.7% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| SciCode | 53.6% | 52.3% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 11.6% | 13.1% | Inkling 2 Small |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 17.6% | 25.4% | Inkling 2 Small |
| FrontierCode | 39.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| WeirdML | 60.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MirrorCode | 21.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1667.4 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1467 | 1455 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1464 | 1443 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1508 | 1660 | Inkling 2 Small |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1522 | 1661 | Inkling 2 Small |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1517 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SciCode | 6.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SWE-Bench Pro V2 | Not measured | 97.7% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| GameBench 2 | 54.0 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 75.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 14.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 17.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 35.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 23.8 | 30.6 | Inkling 2 Small |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.7 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 42.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 1.5% | 1.9% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 55.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 24.8% | 38.9% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 36.5% | 46.6% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 21.7% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 67.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 61.5% | 70.0% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 2.9% | Inkling 2 Small |
| Vals Science Index | 25.3% | 32.7% | Inkling 2 Small |
| APEX-Agents | 43.0% | 46.8% | Inkling 2 Small |
| BALROG | 45.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $4,095 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MCP Atlas | Not measured | 85.4% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 14.4% | 25.2% | Inkling 2 Small |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 85.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.5% | 44.1% | Inkling 2 Small |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 20.9% | 28.7% | Inkling 2 Small |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 30.5% | 35.0% | Inkling 2 Small |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 91.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ARC-AGI | 88.0% | 96.5% | Inkling 2 Small |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.5% | 81.7% | Inkling 2 Small |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Chess puzzles | 43.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1452 | 1421 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1477 | 1478 | Inkling 2 Small |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1460 | 1424 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1271 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1281 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| GoBench | 1091 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 82.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 61.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ProofBench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1457 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1467 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MathArena | Not measured | 42.4% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 64.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 67.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 42.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| AA-Omniscience | -17.1 | 16.1 | Inkling 2 Small |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1434 | 1409 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1399 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1444 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1439 | 1415 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 56.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1248 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1241 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1190 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1203 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1099 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1221 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1185 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1142 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index111
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 56.1% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 61.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.6% | Only Inkling 2 Small measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 69.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.7% | 83.3% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| GDPval-AA | 1470 | 1630 | Inkling 2 Small |
| DTBench | 89.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMCA | 48.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 61.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Furniture assembly | 42.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text | 1431 | 1403 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1437 | 1408 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1396 | 1348 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Vision | 1256 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1442 | 1418 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1417 | 1390 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1472 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1456 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1416 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1408 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1454 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1448 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1426 | 1377 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1403 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1434 | 1408 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1436 | 1403 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1418 | 1381 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1401 | 1359 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1260 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1301 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1263 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1192 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1256 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Document | 1454 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1146 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Inkling 2 Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Same cost
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna | Thinking Machines Inkling 2 Small |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Thinking Machines |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 9, 2026 | November 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.20 | $1.00 |
| Coding index | 55.3 | 48.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.04 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.6 Luna better than Inkling 2 Small for coding?
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for coding: it scores 55.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Inkling 2 Small. Pick Inkling 2 Small for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling 2 Small?
GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Luna only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling 2 Small?
GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling 2 Small comparison based on?
44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. GPT-5.6 Luna's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Inkling 2 Small's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.