Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads Claude Sonnet 4.6 on coding, 58.0 to 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.6 Luna costs 12.5x less per output token ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 99 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Luna: which to pick
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Luna are level for coding, 57.3 against 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.
Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or ProgramBench (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.04 against $1.68).
- Shared results
- 99
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
- 19
- GPT-5.6 Luna only
- 20
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Level: 57.3 against 58.0, inside 2 points.
5 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads, 37.3 against 30.1.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads, 42.1 against 31.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna leads, 91.7% against 85.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a AIME result, 92.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads, 87.3% against 86.0%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads, 1284 against 1255.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $0.011, GPT-5.6 Luna $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
GPT-5.6 Luna
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $1.68, GPT-5.6 Luna $0.04.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Luna 58.0 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 8.2 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierCode: Claude Sonnet 4.6 24.3% against GPT-5.6 Luna 39.8%, 23.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against GPT-5.6 Luna $1.20 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Bars | GPT-5.6 Luna | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 8 | 9 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 4 | 2 ties | |
| Reasoning | 7 | 8 | ||
| Math | 2 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 9 | 2 | ||
| Web design | 8 | 1 | ||
| General | 25 | 6 | ||
| All shared boards | 63 | 34 | 2 ties |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index89
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 66.6% | 73.6% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev | 1523 | 1518 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| AA Coding Index | 63.0 | 71.4 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 82.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 77.4% | 93.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 77.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 39.9% | 44.5% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | 0.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 57.3% | 79.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 49.0% | 60.5% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SciCode | 50.1% | 53.6% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 53.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| FrontierCode | 24.3% | 39.8% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| WeirdML | 66.1% | 60.9% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1667.4 | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1503 | 1466 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1491 | 1463 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1512 | 1508 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1527 | 1520 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1529 | 1517 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| SciCode | Not measured | 6.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 30.1 | 37.3 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.8 | 156.5 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index44
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 31.8 | 42.1 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1190 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1213 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1212 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1197 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1226 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1177 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LiveBench research | 63.6% | 51.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LiveBench browser | 68.0% | 68.0% | Tie |
| LiveBench long agentic | 23.1% | 30.4% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.0% | 55.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 25.8% | 24.8% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 38.5% | 36.5% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 60.2% | 67.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 25.3% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 79.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 43.0% | 43.0% | Tie |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 9.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 45.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| OSWorld | 72.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $7,204 | $4,095 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index78
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.6% | 91.7% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LiveBench reasoning | 86.4% | 85.6% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 85.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.5% | 91.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.6% | 39.5% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 87.4% | 91.6% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| ARC-AGI | 86.5% | 88.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | 59.5% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 46.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Chess puzzles | 23.0% | 43.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Mystery game puzzles | 16.0% | 21.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1485 | 1451 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1500 | 1478 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1493 | 1460 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1306 | 1273 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1311 | 1282 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 49.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 92.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 85.8% | 98.3% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 82.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 61.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ProofBench | 45.0% | 60.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: math | 1462 | 1459 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1483 | 1470 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index92
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.3% | 86.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.1% | 84.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 64.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.3% | 64.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 77.1% | 76.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 67.7% | 67.3% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 92.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 35.5% | 41.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: science | 1474 | 1433 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1451 | 1399 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1470 | 1446 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1464 | 1439 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 37.0% | 35.0% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index81
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1284 | 1255 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1269 | 1248 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1258 | 1194 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1278 | 1211 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1234 | 1121 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1275 | 1231 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1196 | 1194 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1235 | 1142 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LiveBench design | 71.8% | 76.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index256
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.1% | 78.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 62.5% | 61.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 46.6% | 44.2% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 60.6% | 69.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| IFBench | 56.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.0% | 83.7% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| DTBench | 89.9% | 89.1% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMCA | 46.5% | 48.5% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 61.9% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 42.5% | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ExploitBench | 23.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1431 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1476 | 1437 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1435 | 1396 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | 1257 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1472 | 1441 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1440 | 1417 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1491 | 1470 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1428 | 1455 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1420 | 1415 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1410 | 1415 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: French | 1465 | 1458 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1464 | 1446 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1440 | 1427 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1443 | 1405 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1464 | 1434 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1479 | 1436 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1444 | 1419 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1431 | 1402 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1298 | 1263 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1307 | 1294 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1296 | 1264 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1248 | 1190 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1195 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1272 | 1257 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Document | 1482 | 1457 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | February 17, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 57.3 | 58.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.68 | $0.04 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than GPT-5.6 Luna for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Luna are level for coding, 57.3 against 58.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for work measured by LMArena WebDev or ProgramBench (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($1.20 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.04 against $1.68).
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $1.68 and GPT-5.6 Luna $0.04.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison based on?
99 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.6 Luna's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.