Gemini 4 Carbon vs Kimi K3
Gemini 4 Carbon leads Kimi K3 on coding, 86.6 to 61.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 4 Carbon costs 1.5x less per output token ($10.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 69 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 4 Carbon or Kimi K3: which to pick
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.4 for Kimi K3, though on 4 benchmarks against 6.
Pick Kimi K3 for work measured by LiveBench reasoning or Design Arena: websites, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 69
- Gemini 4 Carbon only
- 4
- Kimi K3 only
- 64
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 86.6 against 61.4.
4 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 60.0 against 17.4.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 29.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a GPQA Diamond result, 92.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a MMLU Pro result, 88.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 1336 against 1319.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 70.5% against 53.0%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon $0.0070, Kimi K3 $0.011 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Kimi K3 has the number, $0.81.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks, Kimi K3 61.4 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 28.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vending-Bench 2: Gemini 4 Carbon $16,484 against Kimi K3 $5,165, 67.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 against Kimi K3 $15.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 4 Carbon | Bars | Kimi K3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 12 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 10 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 11 | 1 | ||
| Math | 5 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 6 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 3 | 3 | ||
| General | 15 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 64 | 5 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index120
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 91.0% | 53.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev | 1768 | 1658 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 72.0 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 93.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 63.1% | 17.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 89.1% | 85.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 16.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 18.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 59.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 65.2% | 12.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 40.6% | 10.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 61.2% | 25.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 82.6% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 54.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2374.7 | 1524.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1564 | 1506 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1552 | 1497 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1792 | 1672 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1770 | 1640 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1586 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SWE-Bench Pro V2 | Not measured | 97.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| GameBench 2 | Not measured | 49.8 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Not measured | 22.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 60.0 | 17.4 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 169.8 | 158.6 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 29.3 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1273 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1290 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1284 | 1253 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1256 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1200 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1198 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1151 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1223 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1224 | 1068 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench research | 92.5% | 79.8% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | 75.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench long agentic | 72.7% | 36.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 33.4% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 46.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 17.5% | 12.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.6% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 84.2% | 47.8% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 31.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $16,484 | $5,165 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MCP Atlas | Not measured | 82.3% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Not measured | 76.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| τ³-Banking | Not measured | 37.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index111
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 92.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 90.6% | 90.7% | Kimi K3 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 93.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 46.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | 26.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.0% | 40.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 96.5% | 93.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 94.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | 60.4% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SimpleBench | 92.6% | 60.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Chess puzzles | 78.0% | 37.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Mystery game puzzles | 73.0% | 26.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| EBR-bench | 87.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1551 | 1494 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1582 | 1515 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1545 | 1493 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | Not measured | 22.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 97.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 90.5% | 72.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 95.1% | 39.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 87.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1496 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1538 | 1507 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MathArena | 85.4% | 42.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 88.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.6% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.3% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 53.5 | -1.7 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SimpleQA Verified | 77.7% | 50.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: science | 1535 | 1502 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1525 | 1488 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1542 | 1498 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1520 | 1469 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 78.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| PRBench Legal | 53.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1319 | 1336 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1357 | 1340 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1326 | 1353 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1350 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1434 | 1364 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1348 | 1351 | Kimi K3 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1296 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench design | 80.2% | 72.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index151
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 70.5% | 53.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench data analysis | 86.5% | 78.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.8% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 73.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.3% | 88.7% | Kimi K3 |
| GDPval-AA | 1733 | 1542 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| DTBench | Not measured | 91.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 52.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 95.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 77.5% | 34.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text | 1538 | 1475 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1539 | 1484 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1533 | 1453 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: English | 1530 | 1479 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1534 | 1465 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1613 | 1527 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1483 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1495 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1444 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1482 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1477 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1560 | 1481 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1472 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1569 | 1489 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1549 | 1490 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1542 | 1468 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1527 | 1450 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| EQ-Bench 4 | Not measured | 1319 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 4 Carbon | MoonshotAI Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | November 10, 2026 | July 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $3.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $15.00 |
| Coding index | 86.6 | 61.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.81 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than Kimi K3 for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.4 for Kimi K3, though on 4 benchmarks against 6. Pick Kimi K3 for work measured by LiveBench reasoning or Design Arena: websites, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Kimi K3?
Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or Kimi K3?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Carbon vs Kimi K3 comparison based on?
69 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.