Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Gemini 4 Carbon leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 86.6 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 8.0x less per output token ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle
Coding
86.6
Overall
88.3
Output $/M
$10.00
38
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
49.2
Output $/M
$1.25
0
vs boards won of 38 shared

Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.4 Nano: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
38
Gemini 4 Carbon only
35
GPT-5.4 Nano only
48
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 48.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 4 Carbon 94.2% against GPT-5.4 Nano 5.7%, 88.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 against GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 CarbonBarsGPT-5.4 NanoTies
Coding50
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning80
Math40
Knowledge50
General130
All shared boards380
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
LiveBench coding91.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena WebDev1768Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured56.1Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)63.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)89.1%26.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured41.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SciCodeNot measured47.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)65.2%0.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierCode 2.040.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
FrontierSWE61.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
WeirdMLNot measured49.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ALE-Bench2374.71004.5Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: coding15641404Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: software and IT15521402Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev: React1792Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1770Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
GameBench 2Not measured31.1Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CursorBench 4.060.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AA Intelligence Index60.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Epoch Capabilities Index169.8146.4Gemini 4 Carbon
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured16.0Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1224Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench research92.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench long agentic72.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)51.8%5.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)55.8%6.3%Gemini 4 Carbon
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured76.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
APEX-Agents84.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Vending-Bench 2$16,484Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured77.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench reasoning90.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured73.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.3%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)69.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)96.5%78.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
ARC-AGI98.5%51.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
ARC-AGI-294.2%5.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
SimpleBench92.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Chess puzzles78.0%45.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
Mystery game puzzles73.0%9.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
EBR-bench87.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15511380Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: expert15821395Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15451387Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1210Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1225Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured39.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AIMENot measured88.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%87.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.5%44.9%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierMath, tier 495.1%12.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
ProofBenchNot measured5.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1405Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work15381409Gemini 4 Carbon
MathArena85.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
MMLU ProNot measured77.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
AA-Omniscience53.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
SimpleQA Verified77.7%11.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: science15351374Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15251369Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: legal and government15421368Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: business and finance15201366Gemini 4 Carbon
FACTS Benchmark Suite78.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
PRBench Legal53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Design Arena: websites1319Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: UI components1357Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: game dev1326Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: 3D1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: all code categories1348Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench design80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Vals Index70.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench data analysis86.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured47.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBenchNot measured75.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%76.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
GDPval-AA1733954Gemini 4 Carbon
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Furniture assembly77.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LMArena Text15381372Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: instruction following15391362Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: creative writing15331314Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena VisionNot measured1196Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English15301381Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: non-English15341359Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: Chinese16131391Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1367Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1344Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1316Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1396Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1371Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Russian15601363Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1365Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15691382Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: longer queries15491365Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: writing and language15421337Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15271325Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1202Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1232Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1203Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1162Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1160Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.0070Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.130Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Carbon$0.500Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.4 Nano
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 CarbonOpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 10, 2026March 17, 2026
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.20
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.25
Coding index86.644.8
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.14
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than GPT-5.4 Nano for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 8.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.4 Nano?

Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.4 Nano?

Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-5.4 Nano comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Nano's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-gpt-5-4-nano" title="Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-5.4 Nano, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-gpt-5-4-nano">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-5.4 Nano</a></p>