Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
Updated October 21, 2026. 68 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GPT-6 Luna for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.8 for Claude Haiku 4.5, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.
Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 68
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 26
- GPT-6 Luna only
- 34
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna scores 71.4 against 49.8.
3 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna leads, 38.1 against 16.9.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 8.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 72.2%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a AIME result, 82.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 78.7%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna leads, 1272 against 1122.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GPT-6 Luna has a Vals Index result, 52.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna
Claude Haiku 4.5 $0.0035, GPT-6 Luna $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has the number, $0.56.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Haiku 4.5 49.8 from 3 benchmarks, GPT-6 Luna 71.4 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 30.0 points apart on average over 10 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Haiku 4.5 11.4% against GPT-6 Luna 81.7%, 70.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against GPT-6 Luna $0.50 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, GPT-6 Luna 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Bars | GPT-6 Luna | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 7 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 5 | ||
| Math | 1 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 2 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 9 | ||
| General | 11 | 12 | ||
| All shared boards | 21 | 47 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index28
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 64.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | 48.1% | 84.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1578 | GPT-6 Luna |
| AA Coding Index | 43.9 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 41.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 66.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 13.6% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 11.4% | 81.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 7.5% | 42.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.6% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 43.8% | 73.0% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 37.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.3% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 54.6% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 35.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 42.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| WeirdML | 45.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1576.9 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1454 | 1437 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1439 | 1423 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1326 | 1573 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1318 | 1595 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1571 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 16.9 | 38.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.2 | 156.8 | GPT-6 Luna |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 8.0 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1189 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1158 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1133 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench research | 42.2% | 43.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LiveBench browser | 40.0% | 72.0% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LiveBench long agentic | 11.1% | 48.1% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.7% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 31.0% | 49.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 5.9% | 19.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 10.6% | 30.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.2% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 22.7% | 68.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.3% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 28.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 44.3% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| BALROG | 31.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 45.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SpireClimb | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $459 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 72.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 61.7% | 81.8% | GPT-6 Luna |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 46.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 38.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 71.2% | 90.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ARC-AGI | 47.7% | 86.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.0% | 59.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Chess puzzles | 8.0% | 36.0% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 7.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1421 | 1410 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1443 | 1442 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1435 | 1410 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1245 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1261 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 82.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 66.7% | 98.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 78.9% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 56.1% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 64.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MATH level 5 | 96.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1398 | 1409 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1430 | 1427 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 78.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 81.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 56.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 67.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 62.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 79.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 32.7% | 44.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SimpleQA Verified | 13.2% | 41.4% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: science | 1406 | 1386 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1394 | 1352 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1400 | 1400 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1400 | 1388 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1122 | 1272 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1100 | 1297 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1097 | 1259 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1124 | 1215 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1072 | 1217 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1115 | 1271 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1025 | 1253 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1139 | 1156 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LiveBench design | 59.9% | 82.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1112
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 52.3% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 59.3% | 73.4% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 54.3% | 57.6% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 31.8% | 48.1% | GPT-6 Luna |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.2% | 83.7% | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 42.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 83.3% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| DTBench | 73.6% | 90.1% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMCA | 30.9% | 44.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 44.2% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ExploitBench | 13.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1389 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1414 | 1408 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1371 | 1363 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1216 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1414 | 1393 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1377 | 1381 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1418 | 1427 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: German | 1374 | 1376 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1338 | 1369 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1346 | 1359 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: French | 1411 | 1408 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1421 | 1391 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1381 | 1392 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1343 | 1383 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1409 | 1392 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1427 | 1408 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1386 | 1384 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1369 | 1364 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1204 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1266 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1225 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1205 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Document | 1420 | Not measured | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 | OpenAI GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 15, 2025 | September 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $5.00 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 49.8 | 71.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.56 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than GPT-6 Luna for coding?
Pick GPT-6 Luna for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.8 for Claude Haiku 4.5, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna comparison based on?
68 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and GPT-6 Luna's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.