Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads Claude Haiku 4.5 on coding, 54.7 to 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 17.9x less per output token ($0.28 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
0
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
44
vs boards won of 44 shared

Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.6 for Claude Haiku 4.5, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
44
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
51
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
22
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 31.9 points apart on average over 9 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Haiku 4.5 11.4% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79.0%, 67.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 17.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding09
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge05
General020
All shared boards044
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index09
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev13301634MiMo-V2.6-Flash
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%79.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%40.9%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%76.4%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured51.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14541499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14391497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: React13261648MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML13181641MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.937.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%56.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%28.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%38.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%65.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert14431496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13981476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%41.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941439MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14001441MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14001454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1096Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1071Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1114Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1025Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1140Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%67.6%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%43.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%85.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
DTBench73.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMCA30.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14141452MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing13711403MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14141476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13771431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14181509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: German13741458MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13381359MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13461425MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: French14111480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14211453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13811409MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Polish13431455MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091447MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14271459MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language13861424MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691415MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerAnthropicXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.14
Output $/Mtok$5.00$0.28
Coding index35.654.7
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.6 for Claude Haiku 4.5, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Claude Haiku 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash" title="Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash</a></p>