Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Fable 5.2 leads Claude Sonnet 5 on coding, 87.8 to 54.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Sonnet 5 costs 4.0x less per output token ($10.00 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic
Coding
87.8
Overall
91.7
Output $/M
$40.00
39
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Coding
54.6
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 39 shared

Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Sonnet 5: which to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for Claude Sonnet 5, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $40.00 per million).

Shared results
39
Claude Fable 5.2 only
29
Claude Sonnet 5 only
87
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5 54.6 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 60.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Claude Fable 5.2 65.2% against Claude Sonnet 5 10.6%, 72.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5.2BarsClaude Sonnet 5Ties
Coding120
Intelligence10
Agentic work70
Reasoning50
Math40
Knowledge10
Web design50
General40
All shared boards390
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index120
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
LiveBench coding79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena WebDev18381539Claude Fable 5.2
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.5Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured79.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)65.2%10.6%Claude Fable 5.2
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)93.8%81.3%Claude Fable 5.2
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured44.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)19.0%0.0%Claude Fable 5.2
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)62.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured46.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SciCode67.7%54.3%Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)61.6%14.1%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierCode 2.049.1%17.8%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierCodeNot measured42.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierSWE69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured37.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured68.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MirrorCodeNot measured63.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ALE-Bench2509.81463.1Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1483Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1474Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React19151539Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena WebDev: HTML17381525Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1539Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SciCodeNot measured10.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured93.2%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GameBench 299.154.4Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench 2.1Not measured74.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 3.0Not measured14.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not measured12.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CursorBench 4.060.0%34.1%Claude Fable 5.2
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
AA Intelligence Index64.6Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index173.4156.9Claude Fable 5.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.6Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1217Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps14021224Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps13251202Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1212Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1202Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1166Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1112Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1180Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets14341047Claude Fable 5.2
LiveBench research94.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench browser86.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%29.4%Claude Fable 5.2
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)46.1%41.8%Claude Fable 5.2
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)5.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured66.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)55.7%5.7%Claude Fable 5.2
Vals Science Index63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
APEX-Agents80.1%54.5%Claude Fable 5.2
Remote Labor Index41.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SpireClimb15.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,378Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1188Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Toolathlon-VerifiedNot measured71.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured88.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.1%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)74.3%41.3%Claude Fable 5.2
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)76.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.9%90.5%Claude Fable 5.2
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ARC-AGI-293.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SimpleBench94.9%60.6%Claude Fable 5.2
Chess puzzles79.0%45.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Mystery game puzzles90.0%35.0%Claude Fable 5.2
EBR-bench90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1461Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1488Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1465Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1292Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1310Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)72.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GoBench2566Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.7%94.7%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 395.1%65.6%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierMath, tier 4100.0%29.3%Claude Fable 5.2
ProofBench100.0%77.0%Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1467Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1479Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MathArena82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
AA-Omniscience66.8Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SimpleQA Verified94.0%33.7%Claude Fable 5.2
GeoBenchNot measured74.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1460Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1443Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1451Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1437Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
PRBench Finance47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
PRBench Legal49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
Design Arena: websites13511268Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: UI components13711267Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: game dev13961271Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1247Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D15171236Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: all code categories13731267Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1184Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1199Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench design85.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
Vals Index71.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench data analysis81.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured66.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured68.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%82.0%Claude Fable 5.2
GDPval-AA18311470Claude Fable 5.2
DTBench99.2%92.5%Claude Fable 5.2
LMCA70.6%50.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured60.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Furniture assembly90.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1442Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1453Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1414Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1450Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1431Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1477Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1441Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1420Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1400Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1463Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1448Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1428Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1454Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1435Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1411Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1273Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1334Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1286Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1257Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1247Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1460Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1221Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Claude Sonnet 5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5$0.0070Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5$0.130Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5$0.500Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Sonnet 5
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5
MakerAnthropicAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026June 30, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$8.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$40.00$10.00
Coding index87.854.6
Independent measurements behind it45
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.87
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Claude Sonnet 5 for coding?

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for Claude Sonnet 5, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $40.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Claude Sonnet 5's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-claude-sonnet-5" title="Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-claude-sonnet-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5</a></p>