Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Fable 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 on coding, 87.8 to 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Opus 4.7 costs 1.6x less per output token ($25.00 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 28 shared
Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Opus 4.7: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 67.5 for Claude Opus 4.7.
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($25.00 vs $40.00 per million).
Model AClaude Fable 5.2Anthropic87.8/1004 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic67.5/1004 independent benchmarks$2.95 per solved task
- Shared results
- 28
- Claude Fable 5.2 only
- 40
- Claude Opus 4.7 only
- 83
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 87.8 against 67.5.
4 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 64.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a AA Agentic Index result, 38.6.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a GPQA Diamond result, 90.2%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a AIME result, 96.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a MMLU Pro result, 89.9%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1351.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Vals Index result, 71.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Fable 5.2 $0.028, Claude Opus 4.7 $0.018 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.7 has the number, $2.95.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 42.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- EBR-bench: Claude Fable 5.2 90.5% against Claude Opus 4.7 19.0%, 71.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Claude Opus 4.7 $25.00 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.2 | Bars | Claude Opus 4.7 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 8 | 0 | ||
| Math | 5 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 5 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 28 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1838 | 1557 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 73.6 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.1% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.0% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 93.8% | 71.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.9% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 19.0% | 0.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SciCode | 67.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 54.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 80.2% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 38.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 69.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 44.1% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 76.4% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 43.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2509.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1519 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1516 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1915 | 1559 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1738 | 1551 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1579 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA | Not measured | 40.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Refactoring | Not measured | 48.6% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| SWE Atlas: Test Writing | Not measured | 38.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| GameBench 2 | 99.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Not measured | 80.2% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Not measured | 68.9% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| ProgramBench | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.6 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 173.4 | 157.4 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 38.6 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1402 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1325 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1434 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench research | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 82.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 32.1% | 23.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 46.1% | 38.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 5.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.7% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 55.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 88.6% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 80.1% | 49.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Remote Labor Index | 41.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 18.2% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 24.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| SpireClimb | 15.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $10,937 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Search | Not measured | 1230 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| MCP Atlas | Not measured | 79.1% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| τ³-Banking | Not measured | 40.2% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 90.2% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 91.4% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.3% | 42.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.9% | 90.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 93.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.8% | 75.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| SimpleBench | 94.9% | 61.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Chess puzzles | 79.0% | 41.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 90.0% | 28.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| EBR-bench | 90.5% | 19.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1506 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1520 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1508 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1337 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1337 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 80.7% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GoBench | 2566 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 96.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.7% | 97.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 95.1% | 70.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 100.0% | 31.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 54.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1498 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1508 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| MathArena | 82.8% | 19.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 89.9% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.4% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.1% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.3% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.9% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 66.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 94.0% | 51.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1508 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1496 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1505 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1491 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| PRBench Finance | 47.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| PRBench Legal | 49.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1351 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1371 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1396 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1517 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1373 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench design | 85.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 71.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 81.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 67.4% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 58.6% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.3% | 78.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831 | 1361 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| DTBench | 99.2% | 94.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMCA | 70.6% | 52.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Furniture assembly | 90.0% | 33.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 26.5% | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1490 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1498 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1486 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1319 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1496 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1481 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1532 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1496 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1471 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1464 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1503 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1495 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1495 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1491 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1506 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1506 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1493 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1474 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1322 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1372 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1328 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1312 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1281 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1327 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1496 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| EQ-Bench 4 | Not measured | 1293 | Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.2 | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 9, 2026 | April 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $8.00 | $5.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $40.00 | $25.00 |
| Coding index | 87.8 | 67.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $2.95 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Claude Opus 4.7 for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 67.5 for Claude Opus 4.7. Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($25.00 vs $40.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 and $25.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.7 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Neither: both take 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.7 comparison based on?
28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Claude Opus 4.7's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.