Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Ember vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Muse Ember on coding, 67.3 to 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Ember costs 12.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse EmberMeta
Coding
64.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
10
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$6.00
5
vs boards won of 15 shared

Muse Ember or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 67.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.9 for Muse Ember.

Pick Muse Ember for output tokens 12.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
15
Muse Ember only
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
113
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Ember 64.9 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.3 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 5.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI): Muse Ember 38.2% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 49.7%, 11.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Ember $0.50 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 12.0x apart.
Context window
Muse Ember takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse EmberBarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding43
Agentic work31
Reasoning20
Knowledge01
General10
All shared boards105
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index43
Coding benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev16091676Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)39.4%38.9%Muse Ember
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.7%77.1%Muse Ember
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%38.9%Muse Ember
FrontierCode 2.027.2%23.4%Muse Ember
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MirrorCodeNot measured52.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1679.1Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1500Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: React16161698Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML16211654Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1638Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GameBench 2Not measured69.6Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not measured27.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured33.7Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.6Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1278Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1279Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1223Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1196Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1215Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1252Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1011Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured49.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured26.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)38.2%49.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)49.0%47.6%Muse Ember
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%15.4%Muse Ember
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-Agents64.3%63.3%Muse Ember
LMArena SearchNot measured1260Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ³-BankingNot measured55.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.1%24.0%Muse Ember
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%29.5%Muse Ember
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1499Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1510Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1505Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1321Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1335Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1509Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1497Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArenaNot measured47.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA-Omniscience7.710.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1514Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1514Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1335Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1310Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1281Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1318Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1287Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1189Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals Index60.5%59.1%Muse Ember
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured81.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GDPval-AANot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1485Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1482Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1494Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1475Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1543Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1475Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1463Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1455Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1504Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1494Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1492Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1493Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1470Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1310Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1353Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1309Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1310Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMuse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0065Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Ember and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMeta Muse EmberQwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.50$6.00
Coding index64.967.3
Independent measurements behind it35
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Ember better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 67.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.9 for Muse Ember. Pick Muse Ember for output tokens 12.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Muse Ember or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Muse Ember costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Ember or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Muse Ember, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Ember vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Muse Ember's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="Muse Ember vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Ember vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>