LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Updated October 21, 2026. 29 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
83.3
Overall
39.5
Output $/M
$0.60
23
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
63.5
Overall
45.4
Output $/M
$6.00
6
vs boards won of 29 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 83.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.5 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
29
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
3
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
84
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83.3 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 63.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 16.4 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: spreadsheets: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1238 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 868, 46.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding53
Intelligence01
Agentic work71
Reasoning20
Web design71
General20
All shared boards236
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index53
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench coding96.0%60.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev16641674Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%34.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%64.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%24.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode55.9%53.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671692Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871649DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.545.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1301Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1223Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1207Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1257Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1238868DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench research79.5%69.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench browser76.0%32.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench long agentic50.9%42.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%50.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%32.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%47.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%60.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoning89.1%88.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%43.1%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1496Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1512Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1492Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites13121275DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13051340Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev13651313DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13301281DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13681337DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13351293DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: ASCII art12441201DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LiveBench design83.4%78.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%78.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%80.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1539Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1460Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1464Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$6.00
Coding index83.363.5
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding: it scores 83.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.5 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>