Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Carbon leads Grok 4.7 on coding, 86.6 to 64.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Grok 4.7 costs 1.7x less per output token ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 71 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.7: which to pick
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.8 for Grok 4.7, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.
Pick Grok 4.7 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: spreadsheets or Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 71
- Gemini 4 Carbon only
- 2
- Grok 4.7 only
- 48
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 86.6 against 64.8.
4 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 60.0 against 35.5.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 1319 against 1243.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 70.5% against 58.6%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Carbon $0.0070, Grok 4.7 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks, Grok 4.7 64.8 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 37.0 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: Gemini 4 Carbon 95.1% against Grok 4.7 17.1%, 78.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 against Grok 4.7 $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.7 500K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 4 Carbon | Bars | Grok 4.7 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 13 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 8 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 11 | 0 | ||
| Math | 5 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | ||
| General | 15 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 68 | 3 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index130
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 91.0% | 73.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev | 1768 | 1641 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 63.1% | 28.8% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 89.1% | 86.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.9% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 57.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 65.2% | 25.8% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 40.6% | 28.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 61.2% | 29.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 54.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2374.7 | 1545.8 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1564 | 1425 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1552 | 1421 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1792 | 1662 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1770 | 1634 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1589 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| GameBench 2 | Not measured | 72.3 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Not measured | 37.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.4% | 46.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 60.0 | 35.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 169.8 | 156.2 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index82
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1284 | 1244 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1224 | 1425 | Grok 4.7 |
| LiveBench research | 92.5% | 89.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | 49.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench long agentic | 72.7% | 45.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 35.8% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 47.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 17.5% | 18.3% | Grok 4.7 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.3% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 34.8% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 84.2% | 54.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $16,484 | $10,537 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 90.6% | 82.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 25.2% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.1% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | 23.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.0% | 43.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 96.5% | 92.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 90.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | 61.4% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SimpleBench | 92.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Chess puzzles | 78.0% | 41.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Mystery game puzzles | 73.0% | 29.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| EBR-bench | 87.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1551 | 1416 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1582 | 1431 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1545 | 1424 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1257 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1292 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | Not measured | 23.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 98.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 90.5% | 53.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 95.1% | 17.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 26.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1416 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1538 | 1436 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MathArena | 85.4% | 35.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.5% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 53.5 | 31.2 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SimpleQA Verified | 77.7% | 56.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GeoBench | Not measured | 61.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1535 | 1415 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1525 | 1394 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1542 | 1419 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1520 | 1390 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 78.4% | 62.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| PRBench Legal | 53.3% | 47.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1319 | 1243 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1357 | 1274 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1326 | 1306 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1222 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1434 | 1251 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1348 | 1265 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1273 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LiveBench design | 80.2% | 75.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index151
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 70.5% | 58.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveBench data analysis | 86.5% | 76.9% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.6% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.7% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 89.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.3% | 80.0% | Grok 4.7 |
| GDPval-AA | 1733 | 1718 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| DTBench | Not measured | 96.0% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 49.4% | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 77.5% | 20.8% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text | 1538 | 1400 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1539 | 1404 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1533 | 1384 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1230 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1530 | 1412 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1534 | 1387 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1613 | 1446 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1374 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1363 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1364 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1426 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1399 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1560 | 1398 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1409 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1569 | 1397 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1549 | 1416 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1542 | 1395 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1527 | 1380 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1233 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1251 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1242 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1203 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1215 | Only Grok 4.7 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Grok 4.7 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.7 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Grok 4.7 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Grok 4.7 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 4 Carbon | SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 10, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | 86.6 | 64.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 4 Carbon better than Grok 4.7 for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.8 for Grok 4.7, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Grok 4.7 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: spreadsheets or Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.7?
Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.7?
Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7 comparison based on?
71 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Carbon's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.7's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.