LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 37 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
59.1
Overall
20.7
Output $/M
$15.00
12
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
61.9
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.28
25
vs boards won of 37 shared

Decision reading

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 61.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 59.1 for Claude Sonnet 4.5, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 when what matters is MedCode (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Shared results
37
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
55
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
29
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 59.1 from 2 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 61.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 27.6 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Sonnet 4.5 22.6% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79.0%, 56.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 53.6x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math03
Knowledge32
General910
All shared boards1225
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev13941634MiMo-V2.6-Flash
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%79.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured51.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14881499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14731497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: React13861648MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991641MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.737.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert14831496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%63.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14491476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%41.1%Claude Sonnet 4.5
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14481462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441439Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14511441Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1173Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1158Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1183Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1114Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index910
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%43.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%85.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
DTBench83.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMCA38.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text14381453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14591452Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421403Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14501476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14251431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14601509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: German14271458MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13901359Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean14021425MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: French14591480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14581453Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14371409Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish14231455MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651447Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751459Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421424Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281415Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerAnthropicXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.14
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.28
Coding index59.161.9
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 61.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 59.1 for Claude Sonnet 4.5, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Claude Sonnet 4.5 when what matters is MedCode (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next