Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads Claude Sonnet 4.5 on coding, 86.6 to 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 4 Carbon costs 1.5x less per output token ($10.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon: which to pick
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.
- Shared results
- 46
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
- 54
- Gemini 4 Carbon only
- 27
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 86.6 against 39.5.
3 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Carbon has a AA Intelligence Index result, 60.0.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 15.8.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 81.6%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a AIME result, 88.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.4%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 1319 against 1181.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Carbon has a Vals Index result, 70.5%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $0.011, Gemini 4 Carbon $0.0070 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the number, $1.16.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 53.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: Claude Sonnet 4.5 2.4% against Gemini 4 Carbon 95.1%, 92.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Gemini 4 Carbon 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Bars | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 6 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 10 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 6 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 0 | 11 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 46 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 91.0% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1393 | 1768 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| AA Coding Index | 52.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 73.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 70.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.1% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 22.6% | 89.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 65.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | Not measured | 40.6% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 46.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 61.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GSO-Bench | 14.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 47.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Cybench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 2374.7 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1488 | 1564 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1473 | 1552 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1386 | 1792 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1398 | 1770 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 46.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | Not measured | 60.4% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 60.0 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.6 | 169.8 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 15.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1036 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1024 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1130 | 1284 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1224 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 92.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 80.0% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 72.7% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.8% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.8% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 17.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 84.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| METR time horizons | 67.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| GDPval | 42.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $3,839 | $16,484 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Search | 1159 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 73.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MCP Atlas | 59.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 90.6% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 79.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 69.1% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 69.0% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 82.3% | 96.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI | 63.7% | 98.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 13.6% | 94.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SimpleBench | 54.3% | 92.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Chess puzzles | 10.0% | 78.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | 73.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| EBR-bench | 2.4% | 87.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| VPCT | 39.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1462 | 1551 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1483 | 1582 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1471 | 1545 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 94.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 77.8% | 100.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 23.9% | 90.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 2.4% | 95.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ProofBench | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 97.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1449 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1463 | 1538 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MathArena | 13.2% | 85.4% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 62.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 62.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 94.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 44.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | Not measured | 53.5 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 30.7% | 77.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GeoBench | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1447 | 1535 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1443 | 1525 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1450 | 1542 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1440 | 1520 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 78.4% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| PRBench Finance | 43.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| PRBench Legal | 40.8% | 53.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1181 | 1319 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1162 | 1357 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1155 | 1326 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1164 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1137 | 1434 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1172 | 1348 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1104 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1200 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 80.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 70.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 86.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 79.3% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GDPval-AA | Not measured | 1733 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| DTBench | 83.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMCA | 38.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 77.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1538 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1459 | 1539 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1442 | 1533 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: English | 1450 | 1530 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1425 | 1534 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1461 | 1613 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: German | 1427 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1389 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1400 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1459 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1457 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1437 | 1560 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1423 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1465 | 1569 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1476 | 1549 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1442 | 1542 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1429 | 1527 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Document | 1449 | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| MultiChallenge | 55.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Google Gemini 4 Carbon |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 29, 2025 | November 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 39.5 | 86.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.16 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Gemini 4 Carbon for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.5 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon?
Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon comparison based on?
46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Gemini 4 Carbon's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.