Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs o3 Mini

Claude Opus 5.5 leads o3 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 57.6 to 12.5, and o3 Mini costs 4.5x less per output token ($4.40 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
Coding
88.8
Overall
87.1
Output $/M
$20.00
42
o3 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
38.0
Output $/M
$4.40
0
vs boards won of 42 shared

Claude Opus 5.5 or o3 Mini: which to pick

Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a coding score, 88.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 Mini for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($4.40 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
42
Claude Opus 5.5 only
67
o3 Mini only
29
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 5.5 88.8 from 5 benchmarks, o3 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 46.6 points apart on average over 9 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: Claude Opus 5.5 95.0% against o3 Mini 0.0%, 95.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 5.5 $20.00 against o3 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1M tokens, o3 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 5.5Barso3 MiniTies
Coding40
Intelligence20
Reasoning90
Math50
Knowledge50
General170
All shared boards420
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured60.4%Only o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured42.4%Only o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured32.3%Only o3 Mini measured
LiveBench coding96.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1807Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.5%Only o3 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)65.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)18.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)95.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)87.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)30.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)74.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.4%Only o3 Mini measured
SciCode66.9%42.8%Claude Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only o3 Mini measured
FrontierCode54.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE62.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured1.3%Only o3 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.7%Only o3 Mini measured
MirrorCode77.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
CybenchNot measured22.5%Only o3 Mini measured
ALE-Bench2147.4Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding15451378Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: software and IT15381364Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena WebDev: React1855Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1753Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1753Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
SciCode18.5%7.7%Claude Opus 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index57.612.5Claude Opus 5.5
Epoch Capabilities Index168.8140.2Claude Opus 5.5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1316Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1309Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1386Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveBench research85.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic85.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)33.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index58.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)91.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)14.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)14.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured31.3%Only o3 Mini measured
APEX-Agents73.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Remote Labor Index21.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
SpireClimb3.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,235Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Search1213Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured75.5%Only o3 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoning92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.3%Only o3 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)61.4%12.0%Claude Opus 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.6%77.0%Claude Opus 5.5
ARC-AGI98.5%34.5%Claude Opus 5.5
ARC-AGI-293.3%3.0%Claude Opus 5.5
SimpleBenchNot measured22.8%Only o3 Mini measured
Chess puzzles67.0%15.0%Claude Opus 5.5
Mystery game puzzles71.0%7.0%Claude Opus 5.5
EBR-bench71.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15361365Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: expert15491364Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15351375Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams1345Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1362Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured86.5%Only o3 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured91.8%Only o3 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.3%Only o3 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%76.9%Claude Opus 5.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 391.2%18.6%Claude Opus 5.5
FrontierMath, tier 495.0%0.0%Claude Opus 5.5
ProofBench100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
MATH level 5Not measured96.5%Only o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math15181396Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work15161399Claude Opus 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured78.7%Only o3 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.5%Only o3 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only o3 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only o3 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.8%Only o3 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.2%Only o3 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified72.2%15.3%Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: science15241339Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15091330Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: legal and government15181328Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14941313Claude Opus 5.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite65.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1335Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1382Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1455Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1398Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1476Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1388Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1328Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveBench design86.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
Vals Index70.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis80.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.1%Only o3 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.7%43.0%Claude Opus 5.5
DTBench98.9%68.8%Claude Opus 5.5
LMCA68.2%19.0%Claude Opus 5.5
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured50.0%Only o3 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured61.7%Only o3 Mini measured
Furniture assembly83.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Text15161337Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: instruction following15371337Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: creative writing15351286Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Vision1321Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: English15191351Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: non-English15071319Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: Chinese15821379Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1303Only o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese15341286Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1313Only o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French14931334Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: Spanish15081321Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: Russian15171304Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1294Only o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15011320Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: longer queries15321343Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: writing and language15321313Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15151283Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena Vision: English1317Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1320Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5o3 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 5.5$0.014Fits in one request
o3 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

o3 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 5.5$0.260Fits in one request
o3 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

o3 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 5.5$1.00Fits in one request
o3 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

o3 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 5.5 and o3 Mini
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 5.5OpenAI o3 Mini
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026January 31, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$1.10
Output $/Mtok$20.00$4.40
Coding index88.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than o3 Mini for coding?

Only Claude Opus 5.5 has a coding score, 88.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($4.40 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or o3 Mini?

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; o3 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or o3 Mini?

Claude Opus 5.5, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 5.5 vs o3 Mini comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and o3 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next