Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Updated October 20, 2026. 93 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 for coding: it scores 92.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 88.9 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 when output tokens cost 2.0x less, or when what matters is Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 93
- Claude Opus 5.5 only
- 12
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 scores 92.2 against 88.9.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 leads, 57.6 against 56.0.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 leads, 1336 against 1326.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads, 70.8% against 70.2%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 $0.014, Claude Sonnet 5.5 $0.0070 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 5.5 92.2 from 2 benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.9 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 9.2 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- SimpleQA Verified: Claude Opus 5.5 72.2% against Claude Sonnet 5.5 46.5%, 25.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 5.5 $20.00 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | Bars | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 17 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 9 | 6 | 1 tie | |
| Reasoning | 10 | 1 | ||
| Math | 3 | 1 | 2 ties | |
| Knowledge | 5 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 1 | ||
| General | 23 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 75 | 15 | 3 ties |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index172
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 96.3% | 94.7% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1807 | 1768 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | 64.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | 92.4% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 66.7% | 69.8% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 18.5% | 6.5% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 95.1% | 83.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 87.6% | 83.2% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 70.2% | 58.3% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 30.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 74.6% | 59.6% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| SciCode | 66.9% | 61.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| FrontierCode | 54.6% | 52.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | 61.9% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2147.4 | 1819.1 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1545 | 1513 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1538 | 1501 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1855 | 1817 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1753 | 1741 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1753 | 1737 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 57.6 | 56.0 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.8 | 164.4 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index96
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1318 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1323 | 1272 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LiveBench research | 85.0% | 83.6% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LiveBench browser | 80.0% | 84.0% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 85.0% | 78.8% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 33.6% | 30.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 58.6% | 58.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 45.6% | 42.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 50.5% | 48.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 9.2% | 10.4% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 75.9% | 75.7% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 79.3% | 81.1% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 47.1% | 47.1% | Tie |
| Vals Science Index | 58.7% | 59.1% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 14.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | 75.5% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Remote Labor Index | 21.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| SpireClimb | 3.3% | 1.3% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $9,235 | $11,165 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| LMArena Search | 1213 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index101
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 92.2% | 91.6% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 49.5% | 49.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.4% | 55.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.6% | 95.6% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam | Not measured | 46.1% | Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 67.0% | 59.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 71.0% | 65.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| EBR-bench | 71.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1535 | 1493 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1550 | 1532 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1533 | 1503 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1345 | 1329 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1362 | 1331 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 100.0% | Tie |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 91.2% | 88.8% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 95.0% | 80.5% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 100.0% | Tie |
| LMArena Text: math | 1508 | 1499 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1506 | 1506 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.8% | 52.9% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | 46.5% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1522 | 1479 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1513 | 1456 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1510 | 1485 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1492 | 1460 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1336 | 1326 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1386 | 1372 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1458 | 1472 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1397 | 1387 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1477 | 1458 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1390 | 1365 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1332 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 5.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 86.9% | 85.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index233
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 70.2% | 70.8% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.3% | 59.5% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.6% | 67.2% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 45.8% | 51.8% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 91.4% | 91.1% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 84.7% | 82.7% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| DTBench | 98.9% | 97.3% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMCA | 68.2% | 68.3% | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
| Furniture assembly | 83.3% | 75.0% | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text | 1516 | 1470 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1536 | 1488 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1534 | 1467 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | 1287 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1517 | 1485 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1507 | 1454 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1584 | 1537 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1505 | 1497 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1519 | 1450 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1519 | 1445 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1502 | 1463 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1531 | 1494 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1534 | 1472 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1511 | 1458 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1317 | 1289 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1326 | 1297 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1320 | 1242 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | September 28, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $4.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $20.00 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 92.2 | 88.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Claude Sonnet 5.5 for coding?
Pick Claude Opus 5.5 for coding: it scores 92.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 88.9 for Claude Sonnet 5.5. Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 when output tokens cost 2.0x less, or when what matters is Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Neither: both take 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 comparison based on?
93 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 20, 2026. Claude Opus 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Claude Sonnet 5.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.