Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads Claude Opus 4.5 on coding, 86.6 to 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 4 Carbon costs 2.5x less per output token ($10.00 vs $25.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 47 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 47 shared
Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon: which to pick
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 43.9 for Claude Opus 4.5.
Claude Opus 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.
Model AClaude Opus 4.5Anthropic43.9/1003 independent benchmarks$1.37 per solved taskModel BGemini 4 CarbonGoogle86.6/1004 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
- Shared results
- 47
- Claude Opus 4.5 only
- 65
- Gemini 4 Carbon only
- 26
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 86.6 against 43.9.
3 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Carbon has a AA Intelligence Index result, 60.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 85.9%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a AIME result, 95.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon leads, 1319 against 1239.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Gemini 4 Carbon has a Vals Index result, 70.5%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 4 Carbon
Gemini 4 Carbon takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Opus 4.5 $0.018, Gemini 4 Carbon $0.0070 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has the number, $1.37.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 4.5 43.9 from 3 benchmarks, Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 43.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: Claude Opus 4.5 4.9% against Gemini 4 Carbon 95.1%, 90.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 4.5 $25.00 against Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Gemini 4 Carbon 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.5 | Bars | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 6 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 10 | ||
| Math | 0 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 6 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 0 | 13 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 47 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench (full test set) | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 70.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 91.0% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1493 | 1768 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 76.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.1% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 20.6% | 89.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 65.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | Not measured | 40.6% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 63.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 61.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GSO-Bench | 26.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Cybench | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 2374.7 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1503 | 1564 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1483 | 1552 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1477 | 1792 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1511 | 1770 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GameBench 2 | 49.9 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 63.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | Not measured | 60.4% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 60.0 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.9 | 169.8 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1135 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1130 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1181 | 1284 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1162 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1224 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 92.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 80.0% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 72.7% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.8% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.8% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 17.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 84.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| METR time horizons | 75.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 3.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GDPval | 45.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| BALROG | 43.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld | 66.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $4,967 | $16,484 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Search | 1179 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 77.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MCP Atlas | 69.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| τ³-Banking | 24.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 90.6% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 30.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 69.1% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 69.0% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 86.0% | 96.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI | 80.0% | 98.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | 94.2% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| SimpleBench | 62.0% | 92.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Chess puzzles | 14.0% | 78.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Mystery game puzzles | 22.0% | 73.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| EBR-bench | 14.3% | 87.6% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| VPCT | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1477 | 1551 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1488 | 1582 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1482 | 1545 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 95.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 95.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.1% | 100.0% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 34.4% | 90.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 4.9% | 95.1% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| ProofBench | 36.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1463 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1468 | 1538 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| MathArena | Not measured | 85.4% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 62.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 95.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | Not measured | 53.5 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 45.7% | 77.7% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GeoBench | 75.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1453 | 1535 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1444 | 1525 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1459 | 1542 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1449 | 1520 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 78.4% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| PRBench Finance | 46.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| PRBench Legal | 44.2% | 53.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1239 | 1319 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1228 | 1357 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1218 | 1326 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1240 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1193 | 1434 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1231 | 1348 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1170 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1185 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 80.2% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 70.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 86.5% | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| IFBench | 58.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 77.3% | 79.3% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| GDPval-AA | Not measured | 1733 | Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured |
| DTBench | 89.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMCA | 44.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CL-bench | 21.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 28.3% | 77.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1538 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1478 | 1539 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1444 | 1533 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: English | 1461 | 1530 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1437 | 1534 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1470 | 1613 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: German | 1449 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1417 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1425 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1470 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1458 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1447 | 1560 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1439 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1466 | 1569 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1479 | 1549 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1451 | 1542 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1434 | 1527 | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| LMArena Document | 1466 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MultiChallenge | 59.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 4 Carbon | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Opus 4.5$0.018Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon$0.0070Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Opus 4.5$0.325Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon$0.130Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Opus 4.5$1.25Exceeds the context window
Gemini 4 Carbon$0.500Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.5 | Google Gemini 4 Carbon |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 24, 2025 | November 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $5.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $25.00 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 43.9 | 86.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.37 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Gemini 4 Carbon for coding?
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 43.9 for Claude Opus 4.5. Claude Opus 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon?
Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon comparison based on?
47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Opus 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Gemini 4 Carbon's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.