Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra leads Claude Opus 4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 52.7 to 22.8, and GPT-6 Astra costs 1.5x less per output token ($50.00 vs $75.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 54 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
Coding
No data
Overall
50.2
Output $/M
$75.00
2
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
Coding
85.1
Overall
83.0
Output $/M
$50.00
52
vs boards won of 54 shared

Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Astra: which to pick

Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, 85.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena Text: French or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Shared results
54
Claude Opus 4.1 only
19
GPT-6 Astra only
67
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.1 not benchmarked, GPT-6 Astra 85.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 44.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: Claude Opus 4.1 2.4% against GPT-6 Astra 97.6%, 95.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.1 $75.00 against GPT-6 Astra $50.00 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.1 takes 200K tokens, GPT-6 Astra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.1BarsGPT-6 AstraTies
Coding06
Intelligence02
Reasoning06
Math05
Knowledge06
Web design08
General219
All shared boards252
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured93.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena WebDev13901774GPT-6 Astra
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.9Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured59.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured89.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured5.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured100.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SciCodeNot measured56.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench38.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured53.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierSWENot measured65.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GSO-BenchNot measured79.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
WeirdML45.9%93.3%GPT-6 Astra
MirrorCodeNot measured46.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Cybench42.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured2951.3Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: coding14791489GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: software and IT14561474GPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1798Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13991775GPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1726Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SciCode4.6%12.3%GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.852.7GPT-6 Astra
Epoch Capabilities Index144.1168.8GPT-6 Astra
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured51.0Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1373Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1357Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1312Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1348Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1365Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench researchNot measured85.2%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured82.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured56.9%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured62.9%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured65.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured90.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.2%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Not measured23.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured64.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
METR time horizons66.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured20.8%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GDPval43.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
BALROGNot measured68.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
DeepResearch Bench48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
SpireClimbNot measured25.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$15,515Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
GPQA Diamond76.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured92.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured53.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured96.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured54.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)77.3%95.8%GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGINot measured98.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured95.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SimpleBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured74.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Mystery game puzzles21.0%84.0%GPT-6 Astra
EBR-bench7.9%76.2%GPT-6 Astra
VPCT35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14421463GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: expert14381489GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14511464GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1297Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1337Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
AIME78.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME68.9%100.0%GPT-6 Astra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 312.6%93.7%GPT-6 Astra
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%97.6%GPT-6 Astra
ProofBenchNot measured99.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: math14311465GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341484GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
MMLU Pro87.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.2%48.5%GPT-6 Astra
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured75.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: science14221451GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14161425GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: legal and government14211462GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: business and finance14061439GPT-6 Astra
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.4%75.7%GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
Design Arena: websites11761336GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: UI components11621393GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: game dev11711478GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: data viz11661335GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: 3D11521500GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: all code categories11701379GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: SVG11521431GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: ASCII art11671353GPT-6 Astra
LiveBench designNot measured82.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index219
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
Vals IndexNot measured65.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured83.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.4%46.4%GPT-6 Astra
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9%87.9%GPT-6 Astra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
DTBench80.0%97.3%GPT-6 Astra
LMCA37.1%64.4%GPT-6 Astra
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)84.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.1 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured80.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text14191441GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: instruction following14351455GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: creative writing14121420GPT-6 Astra
LMArena VisionNot measured1280Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: English14331447GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: non-English14051432GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Chinese14271489GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: German14131459GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Japanese13771405GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Korean13811428GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: French14331432Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14481422Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text: Russian14221438GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Polish14131422GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: multi-turn14441447GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: longer queries14551460GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: writing and language14181437GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13981427GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1361Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1292Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1286Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-6 AstraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.052Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$0.035Fits in one request

GPT-6 Astra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$0.975Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$0.650Fits in one request

GPT-6 Astra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.1$3.75Exceeds the context window
GPT-6 Astra$2.50Fits in one request

GPT-6 Astra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-6 Astra
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.1OpenAI GPT-6 Astra
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 5, 2025September 4, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$15.00$10.00
Output $/Mtok$75.00$50.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked85.1
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than GPT-6 Astra for coding?

Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, 85.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Claude Opus 4.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Claude Opus 4.1 for work measured by LMArena Text: French or LMArena Text: Spanish, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Astra?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 and $50.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Astra comparison based on?

54 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-6 Astra's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next