Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Gemini 4 Carbon leads Claude Haiku 5.5 on coding, 86.6 to 68.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 68 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
Coding
68.4
Overall
64.3
Output $/M
$0.50
2
Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle
Coding
86.6
Overall
88.3
Output $/M
$10.00
66
vs boards won of 68 shared

Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 68.4 for Claude Haiku 5.5, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
68
Claude Haiku 5.5 only
39
Gemini 4 Carbon only
5
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 5.5 68.4 from 5 benchmarks, Gemini 4 Carbon 86.6 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Knowledge, 28.3 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vending-Bench 2: Claude Haiku 5.5 $3,602 against Gemini 4 Carbon $16,484, 77.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 5.5 $0.50 against Gemini 4 Carbon $10.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Gemini 4 Carbon 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 5.5BarsGemini 4 CarbonTies
Coding112
Intelligence02
Agentic work08
Reasoning012
Math04
Knowledge07
Web design06
General115
All shared boards266
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index112
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
LiveBench coding77.6%91.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev15931768Gemini 4 Carbon
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)36.4%63.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.4%89.1%Claude Haiku 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)44.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)20.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)32.8%65.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierCode 2.034.9%40.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierCode46.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE43.8%61.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
MirrorCode78.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
ALE-Bench1587.02374.7Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: coding14541564Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: software and IT14431552Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev: React16151792Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena WebDev: HTML15641770Gemini 4 Carbon
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V287.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
GameBench 275.1Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.040.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
CursorBench 4.048.4%60.4%Gemini 4 Carbon
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.560.0Gemini 4 Carbon
Epoch Capabilities Index160.4169.8Gemini 4 Carbon
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1284Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1224Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured
LiveBench research84.3%92.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench browser69.5%80.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench long agentic47.9%72.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
SREBench (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)54.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.9%51.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%55.8%Gemini 4 Carbon
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%17.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.1%84.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
Vending-Bench 2$3,602$16,484Gemini 4 Carbon
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.4%90.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.6%69.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)47.5%69.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.6%96.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
ARC-AGI89.0%98.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
ARC-AGI-261.3%94.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
SimpleBenchNot measured92.6%Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Chess puzzles55.0%78.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
Mystery game puzzles30.0%73.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
EBR-bench43.8%87.6%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: hard prompts14181551Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: expert14431582Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221545Gemini 4 Carbon
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%100.0%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 375.1%90.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%95.1%Gemini 4 Carbon
ProofBench89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1436Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work14371538Gemini 4 Carbon
MathArenaNot measured85.4%Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
AA-Omniscience12.353.5Gemini 4 Carbon
SimpleQA Verified23.8%77.7%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: science14111535Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13671525Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: legal and government13891542Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: business and finance14001520Gemini 4 Carbon
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.3%78.4%Gemini 4 Carbon
PRBench LegalNot measured53.3%Only Gemini 4 Carbon measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
Design Arena: websites12531319Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: UI components12711357Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: game dev13161326Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: data viz1277Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D13211434Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: all code categories12781348Gemini 4 Carbon
Design Arena: SVG1193Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1210Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LiveBench design79.3%80.2%Gemini 4 Carbon
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index115
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
Vals Index58.7%70.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
LiveBench data analysis53.1%86.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)63.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)89.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%79.3%Claude Haiku 5.5
GDPval-AA16291733Gemini 4 Carbon
DTBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMCA51.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly47.5%77.5%Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text13981538Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: instruction following14111539Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: creative writing13371533Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: English14061530Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: non-English13851534Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: Chinese14331613Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: German1429Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1374Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1382Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1427Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1397Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13771560Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: Polish1378Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13881569Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: longer queries13951549Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: writing and language13691542Gemini 4 Carbon
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13511527Gemini 4 Carbon
MultiChallenge67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 CarbonLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0003Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon$0.0070Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.0065Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon$0.130Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5$0.025Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Carbon$0.500Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 5.5Google Gemini 4 Carbon
MakerAnthropicGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 7, 2026November 10, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.50$10.00
Coding index68.486.6
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemini 4 Carbon for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon for coding: it scores 86.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 68.4 for Claude Haiku 5.5, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 4 Carbon costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon comparison based on?

68 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Haiku 5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Gemini 4 Carbon's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-gemini-4-carbon" title="Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-gemini-4-carbon">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon</a></p>