Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3

Claude Fable 5.2 leads MiniMax M3 on coding, 87.8 to 33.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3 costs 33.3x less per output token ($1.20 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic
Coding
87.8
Overall
91.7
Output $/M
$40.00
38
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
33.6
Overall
47.1
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 38 shared

Claude Fable 5.2 or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.6 for MiniMax M3, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick MiniMax M3 for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($1.20 vs $40.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
38
Claude Fable 5.2 only
30
MiniMax M3 only
80
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M3 33.6 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 55.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Claude Fable 5.2 65.2% against MiniMax M3 1.0%, 85.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5.2BarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding110
Intelligence20
Agentic work60
Reasoning70
Math20
Knowledge10
Web design50
General40
All shared boards380
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index110
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench coding79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena WebDev18381484Claude Fable 5.2
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.6Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)65.2%1.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)93.8%47.6%Claude Fable 5.2
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)62.3%33.3%Claude Fable 5.2
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode67.7%47.1%Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)61.6%2.0%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierCode 2.049.1%21.9%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
FrontierSWE69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ALE-Bench2509.8640.0Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1468Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React19151479Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena WebDev: HTML17381460Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1473Only MiniMax M3 measured
GameBench 299.129.0Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench 4.0Not measured7.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CursorBench 4.060.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index64.618.9Claude Fable 5.2
Epoch Capabilities Index173.4147.7Claude Fable 5.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1186Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps14021175Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps13251169Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1156Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1110Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1076Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1171Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets14341159Claude Fable 5.2
LiveBench research94.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench browser86.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%20.6%Claude Fable 5.2
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)46.1%29.8%Claude Fable 5.2
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)5.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vals Science Index63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured88.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
APEX-Agents80.1%37.7%Claude Fable 5.2
Remote Labor Index41.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SpireClimb15.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)74.3%39.0%Claude Fable 5.2
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%16.0%Claude Fable 5.2
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)76.5%28.0%Claude Fable 5.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.9%90.9%Claude Fable 5.2
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ARC-AGI-293.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SimpleBench94.9%45.8%Claude Fable 5.2
Chess puzzles79.0%17.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Mystery game puzzles90.0%8.0%Claude Fable 5.2
EBR-bench90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1442Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1460Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1452Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)72.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GoBench2566Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME99.7%71.1%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 395.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ProofBench100.0%18.0%Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1423Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1443Only MiniMax M3 measured
MathArena82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA-Omniscience66.8-5.5Claude Fable 5.2
SimpleQA Verified94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1446Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1431Only MiniMax M3 measured
PRBench Finance47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
PRBench Legal49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websites13511249Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: UI components13711235Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: game dev13961200Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1229Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3D15171189Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: all code categories13731236Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1146Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1149Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench design85.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
Vals Index71.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench data analysis81.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBenchNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%83.0%Claude Fable 5.2
GDPval-AA18311250Claude Fable 5.2
DTBench99.2%78.9%Claude Fable 5.2
LMCA70.6%33.7%Claude Fable 5.2
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Furniture assembly90.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1395Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1249Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1440Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1414Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1465Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1429Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1363Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1365Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1439Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1424Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1422Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1417Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1439Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1440Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1411Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1398Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1260Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1310Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1256Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1196Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1232Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1437Only MiniMax M3 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1140Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5.2 and MiniMax M3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3
MakerAnthropicMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026May 31, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$8.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$40.00$1.20
Coding index87.833.6
Independent measurements behind it45
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.6 for MiniMax M3, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick MiniMax M3 for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($1.20 vs $40.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or MiniMax M3?

Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-minimax-minimax-m3" title="Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-minimax-minimax-m3">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3</a></p>