Claude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K2.6
Claude Fable 5.2 leads Kimi K2.6 on coding, 87.8 to 52.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Kimi K2.6 costs 10.0x less per output token ($4.00 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 35 shared
Claude Fable 5.2 or Kimi K2.6: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.1 for Kimi K2.6.
Pick Kimi K2.6 for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $40.00 per million).
Model AClaude Fable 5.2Anthropic87.8/1004 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BKimi K2.6Moonshot AI52.1/1003 independent benchmarks$0.35 per solved task
- Shared results
- 35
- Claude Fable 5.2 only
- 33
- Kimi K2.6 only
- 77
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 87.8 against 52.1.
4 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 64.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has a AA Agentic Index result, 20.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has a GPQA Diamond result, 89.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 leads, 1351 against 1263.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Vals Index result, 71.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2.6
Claude Fable 5.2 $0.028, Kimi K2.6 $0.0029 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has the number, $0.35.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 52.1 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 59.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- EBR-bench: Claude Fable 5.2 90.5% against Kimi K2.6 2.4%, 88.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Kimi K2.6 $4.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, Kimi K2.6 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.2 | Bars | Kimi K2.6 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 8 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 5 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 5 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 35 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1838 | 1509 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 61.8 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.8% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.2% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 93.8% | 37.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 27.8% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 19.0% | 0.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.6% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SciCode | 67.7% | 51.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.9% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.6% | 0.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 69.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 55.9% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2509.8 | 1092.7 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1489 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1484 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1915 | 1504 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1738 | 1486 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1522 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| GameBench 2 | 99.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.6 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 173.4 | 151.6 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 20.5 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1268 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1402 | 1130 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1325 | 1147 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1152 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1100 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1084 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1080 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1095 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1434 | 1276 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LiveBench research | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 82.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.9% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 32.1% | 12.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 46.1% | 15.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 5.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.9% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 55.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 95.9% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 80.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 41.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 4.6% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| SpireClimb | 15.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $6,205 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Not measured | 58.0% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 89.1% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 91.1% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.3% | 37.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.9% | 90.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SimpleBench | 94.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 79.0% | 20.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 90.0% | 18.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| EBR-bench | 90.5% | 2.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1470 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1492 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1471 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1298 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1310 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GoBench | 2566 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.7% | 96.1% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 95.1% | 57.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 100.0% | 25.6% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 16.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1475 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1480 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MathArena | 82.8% | 23.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 87.6% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.7% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.2% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.7% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.7% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.8% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.1% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 66.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 94.0% | 34.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1468 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1456 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1461 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1445 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| PRBench Finance | 47.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| PRBench Legal | 49.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1351 | 1263 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1371 | 1257 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1396 | 1239 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1246 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1517 | 1247 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1373 | 1262 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1170 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1152 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LiveBench design | 85.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 71.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 81.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 56.6% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 78.2% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 56.4% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 76.0% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.3% | 81.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831 | 1046 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| DTBench | 99.2% | 90.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMCA | 70.6% | 37.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Furniture assembly | 90.0% | 21.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 18.4% | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1455 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1451 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1433 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1282 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1460 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1446 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1521 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1454 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1440 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1427 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1471 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1464 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1446 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1438 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1454 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1468 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1439 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1428 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1287 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1347 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1292 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1280 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1273 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1450 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| EQ-Bench 4 | Not measured | 1191 | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K2.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
Kimi K2.6$0.0029Fits in one request
Kimi K2.6 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
Kimi K2.6$0.059Fits in one request
Kimi K2.6 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
Kimi K2.6$0.230Fits in one request
Kimi K2.6 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.2 | MoonshotAI Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | November 9, 2026 | April 20, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $8.00 | $0.95 |
| Output $/Mtok | $40.00 | $4.00 |
| Coding index | 87.8 | 52.1 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.35 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Kimi K2.6 for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.1 for Kimi K2.6. Pick Kimi K2.6 for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $40.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Kimi K2.6?
Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.6 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Kimi K2.6?
Claude Fable 5.2, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K2.6 comparison based on?
35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2.6's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.