Claude Fable 5.2 vs Grok 4.6
Claude Fable 5.2 leads Grok 4.6 on coding, 87.8 to 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Grok 4.6 costs 6.7x less per output token ($6.00 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 59 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Fable 5.2 or Grok 4.6: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.9 for Grok 4.6, though on 4 benchmarks against 6.
Pick Grok 4.6 for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($6.00 vs $40.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 59
- Claude Fable 5.2 only
- 9
- Grok 4.6 only
- 77
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 87.8 against 63.9.
4 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 leads, 64.6 against 31.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a AA Agentic Index result, 52.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a GPQA Diamond result, 94.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has a MMLU Pro result, 89.4%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 leads, 1351 against 1277.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Vals Index result, 71.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens against 500K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.6
Claude Fable 5.2 $0.028, Grok 4.6 $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Grok 4.6 has the number, $0.82.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Grok 4.6 63.9 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 36.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- GoBench: Claude Fable 5.2 2566 against Grok 4.6 1044, 69.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Grok 4.6 $6.00 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, Grok 4.6 500K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.2 | Bars | Grok 4.6 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 14 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 10 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 11 | 2 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 2 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | ||
| General | 6 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 55 | 4 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index140
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 79.2% | 76.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1838 | 1618 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 75.9 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.2% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 95.6% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | 17.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 93.8% | 76.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.6% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 19.0% | 1.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.6% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 78.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 55.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.7% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| SciCode | 67.7% | 56.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.6% | 21.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 49.1% | 19.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 48.0% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 69.9% | 25.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 67.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 41.1% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2509.8 | 1508.1 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1464 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1454 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1915 | 1631 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1738 | 1600 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1607 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| GameBench 2 | 99.1 | 68.7 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | Not measured | 26.5% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Not measured | 20.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.0% | 41.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.6 | 31.0 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 173.4 | 157.8 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index102
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 52.5 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1228 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1402 | 1238 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1325 | 1224 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1281 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1254 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1158 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1147 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1212 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1434 | 1262 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LiveBench research | 94.5% | 88.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LiveBench browser | 86.9% | 49.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 82.9% | 18.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.7% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 32.1% | 33.7% | Grok 4.6 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 46.1% | 48.1% | Grok 4.6 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 5.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.7% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | 72.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 55.7% | 11.4% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Vals Science Index | 63.7% | 38.1% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 5.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 80.1% | 65.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Remote Labor Index | 41.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SpireClimb | 15.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $9,047 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index112
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 94.7% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.8% | 91.2% | Grok 4.6 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 30.6% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 94.9% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.3% | 44.1% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.2% | 21.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.5% | 40.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.9% | 94.0% | Grok 4.6 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 87.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.8% | 67.1% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| SimpleBench | 94.9% | 75.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Chess puzzles | 79.0% | 33.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 90.0% | 34.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| EBR-bench | 90.5% | 30.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1448 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1468 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1445 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1285 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1274 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GoBench | 2566 | 1044 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.7% | 99.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 95.1% | 66.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 100.0% | 31.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 51.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1416 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1465 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MathArena | 82.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 89.4% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.2% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.1% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.2% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.7% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 66.8 | 24.9 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 94.0% | 49.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1437 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1423 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1430 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1414 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 59.5% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| PRBench Finance | 47.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| PRBench Legal | 49.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1351 | 1277 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1371 | 1284 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1396 | 1281 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1281 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1517 | 1253 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1373 | 1280 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1220 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1266 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LiveBench design | 85.1% | 76.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 71.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 81.5% | 75.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.8% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.5% | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.3% | 81.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831 | 1658 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| DTBench | 99.2% | 97.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMCA | 70.6% | 48.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Furniture assembly | 90.0% | 40.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1430 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1431 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1428 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1264 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1434 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1421 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1473 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1416 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1376 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1391 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1448 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1421 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1420 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1424 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1427 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1458 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1433 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1423 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1267 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1289 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1271 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1264 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1264 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1438 | Only Grok 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Grok 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Grok 4.6 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Grok 4.6 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Grok 4.6 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.2 | SpaceXAI Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | xAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 9, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Input $/Mtok | $8.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $40.00 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | 87.8 | 63.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.82 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Grok 4.6 for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.9 for Grok 4.6, though on 4 benchmarks against 6. Pick Grok 4.6 for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($6.00 vs $40.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Grok 4.6?
Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Grok 4.6?
Claude Fable 5.2, with 1M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Grok 4.6 comparison based on?
59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.6's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.