Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Claude Fable 5.2 leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 87.8 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 32.0x less per output token ($1.25 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.
vs boards won of 23 shared
Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT-5.4 Nano: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.
Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 32.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $40.00 per million).
Model AClaude Fable 5.2Anthropic87.8/1004 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI44.8/1002 independent benchmarks$0.14 per solved task
- Shared results
- 23
- Claude Fable 5.2 only
- 45
- GPT-5.4 Nano only
- 63
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 87.8 against 44.8.
4 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 64.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AA Agentic Index result, 16.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a GPQA Diamond result, 77.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AIME result, 88.8%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a MMLU Pro result, 77.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1351.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Claude Fable 5.2 has a Vals Index result, 71.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano
Claude Fable 5.2 $0.028, GPT-5.4 Nano $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has the number, $0.14.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 82.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- ProofBench: Claude Fable 5.2 100.0% against GPT-5.4 Nano 5.0%, 95.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 per million output tokens, 32.0x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano 400K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.2 | Bars | GPT-5.4 Nano | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 6 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 4 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 23 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1838 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 56.1 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 65.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 93.8% | 26.1% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SciCode | 67.7% | 47.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 42.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.6% | 0.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 49.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 69.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 49.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2509.8 | 1004.5 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1404 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1402 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1915 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1738 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GameBench 2 | 99.1 | 31.1 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 60.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 64.6 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 173.4 | 146.4 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 16.0 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1402 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1325 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1434 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench research | 94.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 86.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 82.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 32.1% | 5.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 46.1% | 6.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 5.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 55.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 76.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| APEX-Agents | 80.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 41.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SpireClimb | 15.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 77.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 88.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 81.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.3% | 28.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 93.9% | 78.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI | 98.5% | 51.5% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.8% | 5.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| SimpleBench | 94.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 79.0% | 45.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 90.0% | 9.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| EBR-bench | 90.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1380 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1395 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1387 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1210 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1225 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 39.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| GoBench | 2566 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 88.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 99.7% | 87.8% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 95.1% | 44.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 100.0% | 12.2% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 5.0% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1405 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1409 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MathArena | 82.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 77.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| AA-Omniscience | 66.8 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 94.0% | 11.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1374 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1369 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1368 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1366 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| PRBench Finance | 47.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| PRBench Legal | 49.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1351 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1371 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1396 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1517 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1373 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench design | 85.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 71.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 81.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 47.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 75.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.3% | 76.7% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1831 | 954 | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| DTBench | 99.2% | 80.3% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| LMCA | 70.6% | 36.9% | Claude Fable 5.2 |
| Furniture assembly | 90.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.2 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1372 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1362 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1314 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1196 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1381 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1359 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1391 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1367 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1344 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1316 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1396 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1371 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1363 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1365 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1382 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1365 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1337 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1325 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1202 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1232 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1203 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1162 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1141 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1160 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.2 | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 9, 2026 | March 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 400K |
| Input $/Mtok | $8.00 | $0.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $40.00 | $1.25 |
| Coding index | 87.8 | 44.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.14 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than GPT-5.4 Nano for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 32.0x cheaper ($1.25 vs $40.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT-5.4 Nano?
Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT-5.4 Nano?
Claude Fable 5.2, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5.4 Nano comparison based on?
23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Nano's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.