Inkling vs Inkling Small
Inkling leads Inkling Small on coding, 31.5 to 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling Small costs 3.4x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.05 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 74 benchmarks have a result for both.
Inkling or Inkling Small: which to pick
Pick Inkling for coding: it scores 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small.
Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 3.4x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.05 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.16 against $0.76).
- Shared results
- 74
- Inkling only
- 28
- Inkling Small only
- 10
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Inkling
Inkling scores 31.5 against 27.3.
6 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads, 25.7 against 25.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads, 23.5 against 22.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Inkling
Inkling leads, 87.1% against 83.6%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Inkling
Inkling leads, 86.3% against 85.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Inkling has a Design Arena: websites result, 1224.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
Inkling
Inkling leads, 29.0% against 27.6%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 524K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Inkling Small
Inkling $0.0030, Inkling Small $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Inkling Small
Inkling $0.76, Inkling Small $0.16.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Inkling 31.5 from 6 benchmarks, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 6.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- SimpleQA Verified: Inkling 40.3% against Inkling Small 19.1%, 21.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Inkling $4.05 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 524K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Inkling | Bars | Inkling Small | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 9 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 5 | ||
| Math | 2 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 3 | ||
| General | 21 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 48 | 26 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index98
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 64.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1414 | 1409 | Inkling |
| AA Coding Index | 52.1 | 52.9 | Inkling Small |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.5% | 85.9% | Inkling Small |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 77.6% | 82.2% | Inkling Small |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 0.5% | 0.0% | Inkling |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 19.2% | 19.1% | Inkling |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 11.8% | 13.7% | Inkling Small |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | Inkling Small |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 14.9% | 9.3% | Inkling |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 47.6% | 55.1% | Inkling Small |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 7.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 26.1% | 33.6% | Inkling Small |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 66.8% | 64.1% | Inkling |
| SciCode | 47.0% | 49.7% | Inkling Small |
| FrontierCode | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| ALE-Bench | 946.0 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1466 | 1450 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1465 | 1447 | Inkling |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1404 | 1399 | Inkling |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1399 | 1398 | Inkling |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1410 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 25.0 | 25.7 | Inkling Small |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.4 | 150.3 | Inkling Small |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 22.5 | 23.5 | Inkling Small |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1196 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench research | 59.9% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench browser | 16.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 14.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 46.6% | 41.3% | Inkling |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 15.3% | 15.4% | Inkling Small |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 28.4% | 25.5% | Inkling |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 3.8% | 2.9% | Inkling |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 38.4% | 31.8% | Inkling |
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index45
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.1% | 83.6% | Inkling |
| LiveBench reasoning | 78.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 78.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.2% | 89.5% | Inkling Small |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 31.9% | 33.3% | Inkling Small |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 88.3% | 88.5% | Inkling Small |
| ARC-AGI | 79.5% | 84.0% | Inkling Small |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | 40.1% | Inkling Small |
| SimpleBench | 50.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 6.0% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1451 | 1423 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1466 | 1441 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1448 | 1429 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1251 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1257 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | 90.0% | Inkling Small |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 33.3% | 46.3% | Inkling Small |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 4.9% | 17.1% | Inkling Small |
| ProofBench | 0.0% | 6.0% | Inkling Small |
| LMArena Text: math | 1479 | 1459 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1460 | 1441 | Inkling |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index83
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.3% | 85.6% | Inkling |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.0% | 83.0% | Inkling Small |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 68.6% | 69.6% | Inkling Small |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.3% | 75.5% | Inkling Small |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.0% | 62.3% | Inkling |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 41.2% | 37.9% | Inkling |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | 19.1% | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: science | 1455 | 1428 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1447 | 1413 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1448 | 1415 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1438 | 1413 | Inkling |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1224 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1198 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1165 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1156 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1160 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1205 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1108 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1089 | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LiveBench design | 58.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index212
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 29.0% | 27.6% | Inkling |
| LiveBench data analysis | 72.8% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 58.5% | 59.4% | Inkling Small |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 36.5% | 32.7% | Inkling |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.4% | 84.1% | Inkling |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 49.4% | 50.0% | Inkling Small |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 77.3% | 75.7% | Inkling |
| DTBench | 87.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LMCA | 37.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling measured |
| LMArena Text | 1442 | 1413 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1425 | 1399 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1390 | 1334 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1237 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1442 | 1421 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1434 | 1401 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1493 | 1464 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: German | 1445 | 1408 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1429 | 1401 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1403 | 1367 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: French | 1455 | 1435 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1449 | 1422 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1430 | 1394 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1450 | 1428 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1437 | 1416 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1435 | 1402 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1404 | 1357 | Inkling |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1394 | 1352 | Inkling |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1243 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1292 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1243 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1207 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1205 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Inkling | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Thinking Machines Inkling | Thinking Machines Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Thinking Machines | Thinking Machines |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | July 17, 2026 | July 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 524K | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.975 | $0.45 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.05 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 31.5 | 27.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.76 | $0.16 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Inkling better than Inkling Small for coding?
Pick Inkling for coding: it scores 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small. Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 3.4x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.05 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.16 against $0.76).
Which is cheaper, Inkling or Inkling Small?
Inkling costs $0.975 per million input tokens and $4.05 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Inkling costs $0.76 and Inkling Small $0.16.
Which has the bigger context window, Inkling or Inkling Small?
Neither: both take 524K tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Inkling vs Inkling Small comparison based on?
74 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Inkling's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.