Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads Inkling Small on coding, 54.7 to 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 4.3x less per output token ($0.28 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 60 benchmarks have a result for both.
Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.
Pick Inkling Small for work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 60
- Inkling Small only
- 24
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
- 6
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 54.7 against 27.3.
4 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads, 37.9 against 25.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Inkling Small has a AA Agentic Index result, 23.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Inkling Small has a GPQA Diamond result, 83.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Inkling Small has a MMLU Pro result, 85.6%.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads, 54.8% against 27.6%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 524K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Inkling Small $0.0010, MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Inkling Small has the number, $0.16.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 24.2 points apart on average over 14 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Inkling Small 19.1% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79.0%, 59.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Inkling Small $1.20 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
- Context window
- Inkling Small takes 524K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Inkling Small | Bars | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 13 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 5 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 2 | 24 | ||
| All shared boards | 2 | 57 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index013
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | 1634 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| AA Coding Index | 52.9 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.9% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 82.2% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 24.2% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 19.1% | 79.0% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 13.7% | 40.9% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | 0.5% | Tie |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 9.3% | 47.7% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 55.1% | 76.4% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 33.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 64.1% | 75.4% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| SciCode | 49.7% | 51.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1244.2 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1450 | 1499 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1447 | 1497 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1399 | 1648 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1398 | 1641 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1410 | 1596 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 25.7 | 37.9 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.3 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 23.5 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.2% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 41.3% | 56.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 15.4% | 28.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 25.5% | 38.0% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 2.9% | 13.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 31.8% | 65.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 31.7% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 21.6% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.3% | 35.1% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 88.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ARC-AGI | 84.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 6.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1423 | 1475 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1441 | 1496 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1429 | 1493 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1251 | 1276 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1257 | 1283 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 90.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 46.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 17.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ProofBench | 6.0% | 63.0% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: math | 1459 | 1476 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1441 | 1478 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 69.6% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.5% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 37.9% | 41.1% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1428 | 1462 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1413 | 1439 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1415 | 1441 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1413 | 1454 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index224
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 27.6% | 54.8% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 59.4% | 67.6% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 32.7% | 43.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 85.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 50.0% | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 75.7% | 74.3% | Inkling Small |
| LMArena Text | 1413 | 1453 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1399 | 1452 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1334 | 1403 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1237 | 1256 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: English | 1421 | 1476 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1401 | 1431 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1464 | 1509 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1408 | 1458 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1401 | 1359 | Inkling Small |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1367 | 1425 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1435 | 1480 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1422 | 1453 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1394 | 1409 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1428 | 1455 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1416 | 1447 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1402 | 1459 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1357 | 1424 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1352 | 1415 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1243 | 1269 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1292 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1243 | 1270 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1207 | Not measured | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1205 | 1231 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Thinking Machines Inkling Small | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Thinking Machines | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | July 30, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 524K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.45 | $0.14 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.20 | $0.28 |
| Coding index | 27.3 | 54.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.16 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Inkling Small better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick Inkling Small for work measured by Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) or LMArena Text: Japanese, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Inkling Small costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling Small only.
Which has the bigger context window, Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks is the Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?
60 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Inkling Small's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.