Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark Open

Grok 4.7 leads Muse Spark Open on coding, 66.7 to 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark Open costs 1.4x less per output token ($4.25 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.7xAI
Coding
66.7
Overall
66.6
Output $/M
$6.00
20
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
6
vs boards won of 26 shared

Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Grok 4.7 for coding: it scores 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open.

Pick Muse Spark Open for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($4.25 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Shared results
26
Grok 4.7 only
73
Muse Spark Open only
2
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.7 66.7 from 5 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 14.9 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench long agentic: Grok 4.7 50.1% against Muse Spark Open 18.9%, 31.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.7 $6.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.7 takes 500K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.7BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding71
Intelligence01
Agentic work72
Reasoning11
Web design21
General30
All shared boards206
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index71
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench coding84.5%73.6%Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev16371528Grok 4.7
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)28.8%6.6%Grok 4.7
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)86.2%76.2%Grok 4.7
Code migration (Vals AI)44.8%21.2%Grok 4.7
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
IOI (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)42.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SciCode57.8%58.4%Muse Spark Open
FrontierCode47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierSWE29.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1432Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16631529Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev: HTML16271495Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev: from an image1586Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index46.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index154.4155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index72
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench research86.4%80.3%Grok 4.7
LiveBench browser60.0%36.0%Grok 4.7
LiveBench long agentic50.1%18.9%Grok 4.7
SREBench (Vals AI)3.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)52.3%61.3%Muse Spark Open
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)34.2%26.3%Grok 4.7
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)47.1%38.5%Grok 4.7
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)18.3%25.0%Muse Spark Open
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.0%53.7%Grok 4.7
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)69.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Vals Science Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
APEX-Agents54.6%33.4%Grok 4.7
Vending-Bench 2$10,537Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoning82.7%73.7%Grok 4.7
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)25.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.1%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI90.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-261.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Chess puzzles41.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzles29.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1415Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: expert1439Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1427Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1309Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 353.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 417.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: math1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1435Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SimpleQA Verified56.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science1419Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1395Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1423Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1389Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites12551310Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1275Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: game dev13141282Grok 4.7
Design Arena: data viz1238Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: 3D1274Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1273Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench design78.0%60.3%Grok 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals Index58.6%48.6%Grok 4.7
LiveBench data analysis76.9%60.2%Grok 4.7
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)65.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%78.3%Grok 4.7
DTBench96.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMCA49.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Furniture assembly20.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1381Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision1231Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: English1411Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1449Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: German1366Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1359Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1383Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: French1431Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1420Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1394Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1394Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1376Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: English1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1250Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.7$0.0050Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.7$0.118Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.7$0.460Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.7Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerxAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 21, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$6.00$4.25
Coding index66.747.4
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Grok 4.7 for coding: it scores 66.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open. Pick Muse Spark Open for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($4.25 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark Open?

Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.7's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-7-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-7-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>