Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark Open

GPT-5.4 leads Muse Spark Open on coding, 64.4 to 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark Open costs 3.5x less per output token ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
6
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
7
vs boards won of 13 shared

GPT-5.4 or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.

Pick Muse Spark Open for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
13
GPT-5.4 only
97
Muse Spark Open only
15
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 19.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
APEX-Agents: GPT-5.4 52.4% against Muse Spark Open 33.4%, 19.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding24
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning11
Web design02
General10
All shared boards67
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index24
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev14641528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index71.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%21.2%GPT-5.4
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-Bench31.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdML77.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.01590.1GPT-5.4
LMArena Text: coding1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1491Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React14541529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML14781495Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: from an image1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3155.1GPT-5.4
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1017Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1087Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1030Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1135Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-Agents52.4%33.4%GPT-5.4
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%89.0%GPT-5.4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1507Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: math1488Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1474Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites11991317Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1215Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: game dev11951294Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: 3D1066Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1180Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: SVG1142Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1188Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%78.3%GPT-5.4
DTBench94.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMCA52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision1303Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: English1467Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1465Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1520Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: German1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: French1493Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1480Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1482Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Document1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$15.00$4.25
Coding index64.447.4
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$1.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 47.4 for Muse Spark Open, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick Muse Spark Open for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.4's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>