Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads GPT-6 Luna on coding, 62.5 to 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-6 Luna costs 7.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 87 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna: which to pick
Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash for coding: it scores 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for GPT-6 Luna, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.
Pick GPT-6 Luna for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $3.75 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).
- Shared results
- 87
- Gemini 3.6 Flash only
- 23
- GPT-6 Luna only
- 17
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 62.5 against 57.3.
4 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna leads, 38.1 against 34.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a AA Agentic Index result, 29.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a GPQA Diamond result, 93.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a MMLU Pro result, 89.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash leads, 1300 against 1271.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GPT-6 Luna has a Vals Index result, 52.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna
Gemini 3.6 Flash $0.0026, GPT-6 Luna $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has the number, $1.49.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.6 Flash 62.5 from 4 benchmarks, GPT-6 Luna 57.3 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 19.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tier 4: Gemini 3.6 Flash 22.0% against GPT-6 Luna 56.1%, 34.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.6 Flash $3.75 against GPT-6 Luna $0.50 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.6 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-6 Luna 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Bars | GPT-6 Luna | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3 | 12 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 5 | 4 | 1 tie | |
| Reasoning | 11 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 7 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| General | 25 | 4 | ||
| All shared boards | 59 | 26 | 2 ties |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index312
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 84.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1538 | 1578 | GPT-6 Luna |
| AA Coding Index | 69.2 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 88.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 79.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 13.6% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 64.0% | 81.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 30.9% | 42.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 35.1% | 55.6% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 73.8% | 73.0% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 37.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 45.4% | 76.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SciCode | 53.4% | 54.6% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierCode | 34.4% | 42.4% | GPT-6 Luna |
| WeirdML | 56.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | 715.5 | 1576.9 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1491 | 1437 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1492 | 1423 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1528 | 1573 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1547 | 1595 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1545 | 1571 | GPT-6 Luna |
| SciCode | 10.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.0 | 38.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.5 | 156.8 | GPT-6 Luna |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index54
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 29.0 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1197 | 1191 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1181 | 1158 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1196 | 1131 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1203 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1180 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1088 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1118 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1072 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 43.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 72.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 48.1% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.7% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 56.3% | 49.9% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 18.0% | 19.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 25.0% | 30.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.2% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 65.4% | 68.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 58.5% | 61.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 4.3% | 4.3% | Tie |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 28.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| APEX-Agents | 46.9% | 44.3% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| SpireClimb | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 81.8% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 88.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 40.8% | 38.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 94.1% | 90.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | 91.2% | 86.7% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | 59.3% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Chess puzzles | 42.0% | 36.0% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Mystery game puzzles | 30.0% | 7.0% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1486 | 1410 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1490 | 1442 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1484 | 1410 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1314 | 1245 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1314 | 1261 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 94.2% | 98.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 58.9% | 78.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 22.0% | 56.1% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ProofBench | 36.0% | 64.0% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: math | 1508 | 1409 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1492 | 1427 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| MathArena | 23.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 89.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 86.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 63.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 67.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 53.1% | 44.7% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | 41.4% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: science | 1489 | 1386 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1469 | 1352 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1479 | 1400 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1464 | 1388 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 65.3% | 63.3% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| PRBench Legal | Not measured | 42.9% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1300 | 1271 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1295 | 1295 | Tie |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1263 | 1258 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1289 | 1217 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1271 | 1218 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1289 | 1270 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1253 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1281 | 1153 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 82.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index254
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 52.3% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 73.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 56.6% | 57.6% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.7% | 48.1% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 79.7% | 83.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 65.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.0% | 83.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| DTBench | 95.5% | 90.1% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMCA | 44.9% | 44.5% | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| Furniture assembly | 23.3% | 44.2% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1389 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1467 | 1408 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1466 | 1363 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1299 | 1216 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: English | 1482 | 1393 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1470 | 1381 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1531 | 1427 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1480 | 1376 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1475 | 1369 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1429 | 1359 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1503 | 1408 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1476 | 1391 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1488 | 1392 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1473 | 1383 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1481 | 1392 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1475 | 1408 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1470 | 1384 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1456 | 1364 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1295 | 1204 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1357 | 1266 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1312 | 1225 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1289 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1278 | 1205 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| LMArena Document | 1456 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.6 Flash | OpenAI GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 21, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.75 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.75 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 62.5 | 57.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.49 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than GPT-6 Luna for coding?
Pick Gemini 3.6 Flash for coding: it scores 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for GPT-6 Luna, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick GPT-6 Luna for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $3.75 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna?
Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.6 Flash only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna comparison based on?
87 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GPT-6 Luna's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.