Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Updated October 21, 2026. 68 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash for coding: it scores 71.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when what matters is ALE-Bench or MMLU Pro, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 68
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
- 9
- GLM 5.3 Flash only
- 34
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash scores 71.0 against 8.1.
1 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash leads, 41.8 against 15.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash leads, 50.9 against 1.6.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash leads, 86.4% against 81.1%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a AIME result, 83.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads, 86.2% against 86.1%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash leads, 1272 against 1083.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a Vals Index result, 50.9%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.0010, GLM 5.3 Flash $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
GLM 5.3 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.18, GLM 5.3 Flash $0.02.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 8.1 from 1 benchmark, GLM 5.3 Flash 71.0 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 38.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena WebDev: React: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1245 against GLM 5.3 Flash 1624, 59.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against GLM 5.3 Flash $0.50 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Bars | GLM 5.3 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 12 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 5 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 7 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 1 | 6 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 8 | ||
| General | 0 | 24 | ||
| All shared boards | 2 | 65 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index112
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 80.6% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1257 | 1607 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| AA Coding Index | 34.7 | 71.5 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.1% | 80.5% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 62.8% | 92.0% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 37.4% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 30.8% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 4.6% | 20.5% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.5% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 34.1% | 62.9% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 16.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.2% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.9% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 51.6% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 31.8% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 18.1% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | 797.7 | 303.6 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1400 | 1507 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1413 | 1500 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1245 | 1624 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1276 | 1577 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1336 | 1578 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 15.6 | 41.8 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 153.1 | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.6 | 50.9 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 70.1% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 28.4% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.8% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 30.0% | 57.9% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 3.1% | 31.6% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 3.4% | 45.2% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.4% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 8.6% | 55.9% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.9% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 52.8% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.1% | 86.4% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 77.6% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 82.5% | 86.0% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 91.2% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 39.9% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 90.2% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 91.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 65.8% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 21.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 8.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1407 | 1490 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1398 | 1511 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1403 | 1488 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1242 | 1317 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1271 | 1318 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 83.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 93.9% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 55.8% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 17.1% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 21.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1428 | 1503 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1417 | 1497 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.2% | 86.1% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.8% | 83.9% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 55.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 59.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.8% | 75.6% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 47.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1425 | 1484 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1428 | 1475 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1418 | 1473 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1389 | 1460 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1083 | 1272 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1071 | 1316 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1029 | 1279 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1045 | 1262 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1048 | 1316 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1072 | 1282 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1052 | 1284 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1166 | 1269 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 77.2% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index024
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 50.9% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.4% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 63.9% | 88.9% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 41.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 80.0% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 52.5% | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1471 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1377 | 1478 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1401 | 1441 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | 1294 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: English | 1414 | 1474 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1410 | 1462 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1460 | 1531 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1430 | 1462 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1413 | 1444 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1392 | 1436 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1424 | 1491 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1421 | 1475 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1420 | 1465 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1443 | 1450 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1417 | 1469 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1394 | 1481 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1408 | 1455 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1386 | 1440 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1232 | 1295 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1278 | 1363 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1246 | 1299 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1266 | 1279 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1259 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1308 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1248 | 1270 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GLM 5.3 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Z.ai GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 3, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.25 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 8.1 | 71.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.18 | $0.02 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than GLM 5.3 Flash for coding?
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash for coding: it scores 71.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.1 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview when what matters is ALE-Bench or MMLU Pro, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GLM 5.3 Flash?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.18 and GLM 5.3 Flash $0.02.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GLM 5.3 Flash?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash comparison based on?
68 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GLM 5.3 Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.