Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Updated October 21, 2026. 70 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
54.6
Overall
36.0
Output $/M
$1.98
10
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
63.5
Overall
45.4
Output $/M
$6.00
56
vs boards won of 70 shared, 4 tied

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when output tokens cost 3.0x less, or when a solved task costs $0.10 against $1.32.

Shared results
70
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
8
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
43
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 54.6 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 63.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 11.1 points apart on average over 18 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
CyberBench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 72.9% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 28.6%, 44.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding6111 tie
Intelligence02
Agentic work07
Reasoning162 ties
Math06
Knowledge28
General1161 tie
All shared boards10564 ties
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index611
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev15821674Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding Index68.876.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%85.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%34.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%64.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%24.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%68.9%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%67.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%12.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%42.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%28.6%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SciCode51.0%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding14691502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14621498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: React15881692Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML15661649Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index36.045.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index41.356.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1301Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1223Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1207Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1257Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured868Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%50.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%32.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%47.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%60.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%12.9%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
APEX-Agents47.3%63.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond92.4%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%92.8%Tie
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%92.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%46.0%Tie
Mystery game puzzles43.0%38.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: hard prompts14581496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14591507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14631503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%100.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%74.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%46.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
ProofBench50.0%58.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: math14411501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14431491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro87.0%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%83.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%40.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
SimpleQA Verified52.9%47.3%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena Text: science14571512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14461503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14591492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14421480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1275Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1340Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1281Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1337Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1293Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1201Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index116
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%85.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%80.3%Tie
DTBench93.9%92.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMCA45.5%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14461483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following14481481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing14391477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English14571491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14311473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14811539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Korean14491460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14461498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14351489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14481482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14541489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14581488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language14431477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14241464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.66$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.98$6.00
Coding index54.663.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$0.10$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when output tokens cost 3.0x less, or when a solved task costs $0.10 against $1.32.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.10 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

70 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next