DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6 Luna
Updated October 21, 2026. 65 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GPT-6 Luna for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 65
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
- 13
- GPT-6 Luna only
- 37
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna scores 71.4 against 54.6.
1 and 2 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna leads, 38.1 against 36.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a AA Agentic Index result, 41.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a GPQA Diamond result, 92.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-6 Luna has a Design Arena: websites result, 1272.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads, 53.0% against 52.3%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $0.0016, GPT-6 Luna $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the number, $0.10.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 54.6 from 1 benchmark, GPT-6 Luna 71.4 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 11.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Mystery game puzzles: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 43.0% against GPT-6 Luna 7.0%, 36.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against GPT-6 Luna $0.50 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-6 Luna 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Bars | GPT-6 Luna | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 6 | 9 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 5 | 2 | 1 tie | |
| Reasoning | 9 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 1 | ||
| General | 17 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 44 | 20 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index69
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 84.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | 1578 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| AA Coding Index | 68.8 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 96.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 14.1% | 13.6% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 82.3% | 81.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 41.5% | 42.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 51.6% | 55.6% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 54.7% | 73.0% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 37.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 17.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 53.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 72.9% | 76.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SciCode | 51.0% | 54.6% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierCode | 28.5% | 42.4% | GPT-6 Luna |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1403.2 | 1576.9 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1469 | 1437 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1462 | 1423 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1588 | 1573 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1566 | 1595 | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1571 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 36.0 | 38.1 | GPT-6 Luna |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.6 | 156.8 | GPT-6 Luna |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index52
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 41.3 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1189 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1158 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1133 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 43.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 72.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 48.1% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 1.9% | 2.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 50.4% | 49.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 26.8% | 19.9% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 40.9% | 30.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 10.8% | 4.2% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 52.8% | 68.5% | GPT-6 Luna |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 4.3% | 4.3% | Tie |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 28.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | 44.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| SpireClimb | Not measured | 0.0% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 81.8% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.0% | 38.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 91.7% | 90.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| ARC-AGI | 90.5% | 86.7% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | 59.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Chess puzzles | 46.0% | 36.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 43.0% | 7.0% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1458 | 1410 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1459 | 1442 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1463 | 1410 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1245 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1261 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.6% | 98.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 64.6% | 78.9% | GPT-6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | 56.1% | GPT-6 Luna |
| ProofBench | 50.0% | 64.0% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: math | 1441 | 1409 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1443 | 1427 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 73.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 42.5% | 44.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | 41.4% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1457 | 1386 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1446 | 1352 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1459 | 1400 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1442 | 1388 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1272 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1297 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1259 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1215 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1217 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1271 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1253 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1156 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 82.5% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index172
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 53.0% | 52.3% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 73.4% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.6% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.1% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 80.2% | 83.7% | GPT-6 Luna |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.3% | 83.3% | GPT-6 Luna |
| DTBench | 93.9% | 90.1% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMCA | 45.5% | 44.5% | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 44.2% | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text | 1446 | 1389 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1448 | 1408 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1439 | 1363 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1216 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1457 | 1393 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1431 | 1381 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1481 | 1427 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1376 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1369 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1449 | 1359 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1446 | 1408 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1435 | 1391 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1448 | 1392 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1383 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1454 | 1392 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1458 | 1408 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1443 | 1384 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1424 | 1364 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1204 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1266 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1225 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1205 | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | GPT-6 Luna | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | OpenAI GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 12, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.66 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.98 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 54.6 | 71.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.10 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than GPT-6 Luna for coding?
Pick GPT-6 Luna for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Luna?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6 Luna comparison based on?
65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-6 Luna's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.